[F3A-Discussion] CIAM related news for F3

Thu Jul 23 08:43:06 AKDT 2009

There are some small exceptions. Compare a square 8 with radii A,B,B,B,B,B,B,B.  Clearly the other extreme. 

More important is the same 8 with radii A,B,B,B,A,A,A,A. The likelyhood the the judge is going to be able to remember/ compare the first radius with the last 4 is low. 

Even worse A,B,C,D,A,D,A,A???  Not likely to get that right currently. 
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld

----- Original Message -----
From: f3a-discussion-bounces at lists.f3a.us <f3a-discussion-bounces at lists.f3a.us>
To: f3a-discussion at lists.f3a.us <f3a-discussion at lists.f3a.us>
Sent: Thu Jul 23 12:26:59 2009
Subject: Re: [F3A-Discussion] CIAM related news for F3

I'm probably missing something here, but if you're comparing radii to radii, to radii, to radii, it seems to me that if a guy does 1 & 3 the same and 2 and 4 the same, then according  to 
my understanding, if the severity of the down grade each time is equal to a two point deduction the guy gets penalized a total of 6 points whereas with the current rule, doesn't he only
get whacked with 4 ?  Sounds like it may be more punitive. No?

G.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Derek Koopowitz <mailto:derekkoopowitz at sbcglobal.net>  
To: f3a-discussion at lists.f3a.us 
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:52 AM
Subject: Re: [F3A-Discussion] CIAM related news for F3

I think this is a good idea… it definitely makes it a lot easier to compare radii instead of trying to remember what the 1st one looked like and then drawing that comparison to all the radii when the maneuver is completed.

From: f3a-discussion-bounces at lists.f3a.us [mailto:f3a-discussion-bounces at lists.f3a.us] On Behalf Of Atwood, Mark
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 1:34 PM
To: f3a-discussion at lists.f3a.us
Subject: Re: [F3A-Discussion] CIAM related news for F3

I for one would love to see the 1st Radius rule changed to what we have proposed for AMA.  The proposal (submitted by Lance) uses a radius “change” as a downgrade.  I can go into a lot more detail if there is any interest or we think we can get some traction for it.

The basic premise is that the current rule is very hard to judge, and disproportionately weights the 1st radius over the rest.    Downgrading any CHANGE in radius allows you to simply compare the current radius to the previous one which is much simpler to judge, and given any number of scenarios produces a similar, if not more accurate score.  

Anyone?  

From: f3a-discussion-bounces at lists.f3a.us [mailto:f3a-discussion-bounces at lists.f3a.us] On Behalf Of Derek Koopowitz
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 2:08 AM
To: f3a-discussion at lists.f3a.us
Subject: [F3A-Discussion] CIAM related news for F3

Everyone,

Welcome to the list – if you know of any F3A pilots in the USA that are not members of this list then please pass this information on to them so that they join in on the discussion.

There are several items that I want to share and to hopefully spur a discussion…

1.      If you would like to see a rule change made lets discuss it here so that we’re all on the same page as to why you’d like to make the rule change and to hopefully get agreement from everyone as to whether it would be a good idea to submit a rules change proposal.

2.      Rules change proposals must be submitted to the CIAM before November 15th, 2010 (that’s right – next year) – any rules change proposal submitted will be voted on at the March CIAM meeting in 2011 and will become effective in 2012.

3.      The P13/F13 and P15/F15 schedules need to be designed and submitted.  Any NAC (country) can do this but the schedules must be totally vetted and tested with all bugs worked out prior to submission – we also must include full maneuver descriptions with all possible deductions with the submissions.  Deadline for this is again November 15th, 2010.

Rules change proposals are not just for F3A – the F3 sub-committee is also responsible for F3M and F3P.  For those of you not familiar with F3M – it is for large aerobatic models not exceeding 20kg in weight (ala TOC/IMAC models).  F3P is indoor aerobatics with models not to exceed 300g in weight.  F3M was just voted into a regular status starting in 2009 with the potential to host a world championship event for F3M starting in 2011.  The same can be said about F3P.  We’ve seen huge successes over here with F3P so far and the number of contests is growing every year.  Events such as the e-TOC definitely help with interest although it is my understanding that they do not use the F3P schedules.

Since IMAC has no interest in pursuing F3M, it is really up to us to do this and to perhaps influence the rules and schedules somewhat – I can definitely see the benefits of pushing F3M and F3P (perhaps the NSRCA can adopt both categories?) within the USA and to perhaps one day host a World Championships for both F3M and F3P.

The sooner we talk about these potential rules changes, the better.  I can then “socialize” these with my peers on the F3 sub-committee to see what their take is…

-Derek

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.21/2252 - Release Date: 07/21/09 05:58:00

   _____  

_______________________________________________
F3A-Discussion mailing list
F3A-Discussion at lists.f3a.us
http://lists.f3a.us/mailman/listinfo/f3a-discussion

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.21/2252 - Release Date: 07/21/09 05:58:00