[F3A-Discussion] Proposed Schedule F3A P-17

[Derek Koopowitz]

Thanks. is it my imagination or what, but I think the P-17 sequence isn't
any more difficult than the current P sequence?

 

From: Brett Wickizer [mailto:flyingtrumpet at gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 8:45 PM
To: Derek Koopowitz; f3a-discussion at lists.f3a.us
Subject: RE: [F3A-Discussion] Proposed Schedule F3A P-17

 

All of the options seem to make that particular maneuver easier. I prefer
the original maneuvers in the first attachment.  We need to keep the 1/8th
rolls in the pattern and the course reversal in the middle of the integrated
roll on the original figure S definitely makes it more interesting.  

-Brett

  _____  

From: Derek Koopowitz
Sent: 10/12/2012 10:36 PM
To: f3a-discussion at lists.f3a.us
Subject: [F3A-Discussion] Proposed Schedule F3A P-17

Attached are drafts of P-17. 

 

Please let me know your thoughts on these two proposals. feedback by October
18 would be great!

 

-Derek

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/f3a-discussion/attachments/20121013/3d89e841/attachment.html>