[NSRCA-discussion] More flexibility in class selection?

[Joe Lachowski]

Try 15 years<g>

> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:22:06 -0700> From: seefo at san.rr.com> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] More flexibility in class selection?> > Hogwash.> > This is purely perception at least for Masters and below. The FAI > schedules may have dictated a design philosophy change, but that's > where it ends (currently).> > When anyone wins a major contest, there is always a rush by people to > buy the winning design, especially from those who feel this new design > will somehow make them better. There is no single design out there > that will guarantee a winner, just as there is no single design that > would guarantee a non-winner. > > It's all the in the thumbs. Any competitive design in the last 6+ > years could win Masters right now. Hell.. there's nothing in that > schedule that would prevent an airplane designed in the last TEN years > from winning.> > -Doug> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----> From: Fred Huber <fhhuber at clearwire.net>> Date: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 4:47 pm> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] More flexibility in class selection?> To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> > > Buying the best has always been a requirement to compete in the > > top > > classes...> > > > Chip Hyde designs a plane for FAI... and someone wins with it in > > Masters... > > and nothing else is competitive in 6 months. Fly the new Wide > > body with the > > new super-engine (or super e-power system) or lose.> > > > _______________________________________________> NSRCA-discussion mailing list> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_________________________________________________________________
Learn. Laugh. Share. Reallivemoms is right place!
http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070816/ea5cb16b/attachment.html