[NSRCA-discussion] Removing FAI F from local contests

[Vicente Bortone]

Sounds good to me.  Thanks.

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:44 AM <rixsweeney at gmail.com> wrote:

> No I meant P in nbr #2… Some Masters flyers do not want to adopt FAI P as
> the Masters sequence for various reasons. If only P is flown locally for
> FAI, then it would make no sense to fly FAI P in Masters. So that makes the
> opponent’s of adopting P for Masters happy, and makes the masters flyers
> happy to move up and fly P and not have to fly F.
>
>
>
> Hope that makes more sense…
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
> Windows 10
>
>
>
> *From: *Vicente Bortone <vincebrc at gmail.com>
> *Sent: *Wednesday, July 19, 2017 11:55 AM
> *To: *rixsweeney at gmail.com; General pattern discussion
> <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Removing FAI F from local contests
>
>
>
> Rick,
>
>
>
> I agree 100% with your analysis,
>
>
>
> In #2 I think you meant FAI F.  Correct?
>
>
>
> Thanks for sharing,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:44 AM, rixsweeney--- via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> Perhaps removing FAI F from local contests would solve a few issues
> discussed on this list:
>
>    1. Current Masters flyers who are advocating for the Masters schedules
>    to adopt FAI P as the Masters schedule could just move up and fly FAI
>    knowing they will not be required to fly the F pattern. That makes them
>    happy.
>    2. Current Masters flyers who think adopting FAI P is a bad idea can
>    rest easy as nbr #1 above takes FAI P for Masters off the table.
>    3. Current FAI flyers who have no one to compete against at local
>    contests because of F,  will now have a few competitors that will
>    undoubtedly move up.
>    4. If even one or two Masters flyers move up it will ease the judging
>    issue.
>    5. If FAI guys that want to get some F practice for the NATS or
>    Worlds, they can accomplish that at the practice field, and or another
>    option…A CD could optionally add some F demo flights during a contest and
>    have Masters and FAI guys judge and score them. These would be demos and
>    would not count as a contest flight but allows FAI F guys to get some
>    judging exposure. I have no doubt some of the FAI guys who don’t fly F
>    would be willing to Judge the one or two FAI F guys or even a few Masters
>    flyers. These F demo flights could be flown at days end on either day or
>    however a CD wants to fit them in. Lunch break perhaps.
>
>
>
> I know first hand that a few FAI guys insist on flying F at local contests
> so they get judging exposure and as a result they have no one to play with.
>
>
>
>
> For this to work, all CD’s in all districts would need to adopt removing F
> from all local events. I am seeing many benefits to flying P only, locally.
>
>
>
> Rick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
> Windows 10
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
>
>
-- 
Vicente "Vince" Bortone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170719/b71db38b/attachment.html>