<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<DIV>
<P>Tom</P></DIV>
<P>I fully understand that it was not submitted by NSRCA. My question was, Has anyone submitted a weight change personally? I also think it would enlightening to know,since the vote margin was close. How many votes For and Against the weight change came from each individual Class? But I don't expect that information will be made available.</P></DIV>
<P>Buddy <BR><BR></P>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>From: "Thomas C. Weedon" <WEEDON@WWNET.NET>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Reply-To: discussion@nsrca.org
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>To: <DISCUSSION@NSRCA.ORG>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Subject: RE: bureaucratic organization!
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 04:10:02 -0500
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Buddy,
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>The rules proposals that were submitted to AMA was posted on this list about
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>a month ago. There was no rule proposal for a weight limit change because
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>the membership did not approve such a change. In a series of three questions
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>on the original ballot, the members voted "no change", by a slim majority.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Better luck next time, or write your own proposal and submit it. That is
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>your privilege.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Tom
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> -----Original Message-----
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> From: discussion-request@nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org]On
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Behalf Of Buddy Brammer
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 2:08 PM
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> To: discussion@nsrca.org
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> Subject: Re: bureaucratic organization!
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> Tony I agree. Does anyone know if the weight change proposal was submitted
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>to AMA by anyone?
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> Buddy
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >From: "Tony Stillman"
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >Reply-To: discussion@nsrca.org
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >To:
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >Subject: Re: bureaucratic organization!
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:44:31 -0500
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >Troy:
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >One correction. NSRCA proposals do NOT get an automatic pass on the
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>initial vote.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >This changed about 6 years ago. As a matter of fact, An NSRCA past
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>President, Rick Allison, spent long hours writing a proposal to help
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>counteract this change. However, it ended up being thrown out by the AMA
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Exec. Counsel.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >I am in total support of ANY AMA member sending in proposals. Past
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>surveys prove that NSRCA can't think of everything that needs to be done.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Many things can be missed, or not even thought of. It is also very easy to
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>just sit back and let NSRCA handle everything. Don't do that! That's the
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>problem with the "silent majority" of our country now! We don't vote, and so
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>we end up with what we get.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >It takes nerve to stand up for your ideas. Good job, Troy.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >Tony Stillman
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >Radio South
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >3702 N. Pace Blvd.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >Pensacola, FL 32505
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >www.radiosouthrc.com
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Protect your PC - <a href="http://g.msn.com/8HMWEN/2024">Click here</a> for McAfee.com VirusScan Online </html>