<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>According to the rules survey results , the
question on should</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>the </FONT><FONT face=Arial size=2>weight
limit be raised received </FONT><FONT face=Arial size=2> 74 Yes, 111
No, votes.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>There is a proposal to add language to the effect
of:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>~The contest director has option of deleting weight
& size limits</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>for Sportsman class...such deletion must be
published in ...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>advance...model must conform to AMA weight
limits.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Ron Lockhart</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<P>Tom</P></DIV>
<P>I fully understand that it was not submitted by NSRCA. My question was, Has
anyone submitted a weight change personally? I also think it
would enlightening to know,since the vote margin was close. How many
votes For and Against the weight change came from each individual Class? But I
don't expect that information will be made available.</P></DIV>
<P>Buddy <BR><BR></P>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>From: "Thomas C. Weedon" <WEEDON@WWNET.NET>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Reply-To: discussion@nsrca.org
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>To: <DISCUSSION@NSRCA.ORG>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Subject: RE: bureaucratic organization!
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 04:10:02 -0500
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Buddy,
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>The rules proposals that were submitted to AMA was posted on
this list about
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>a month ago. There was no rule proposal for a weight limit
change because
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>the membership did not approve such a change. In a series of
three questions
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>on the original ballot, the members voted "no change", by a
slim majority.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Better luck next time, or write your own proposal and submit
it. That is
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>your privilege.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Tom
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> -----Original Message-----
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> From: discussion-request@nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org]On
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Behalf Of Buddy Brammer
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 2:08 PM
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> To: discussion@nsrca.org
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> Subject: Re: bureaucratic organization!
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> Tony I agree. Does anyone know if the weight change proposal
was submitted
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>to AMA by anyone?
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> Buddy
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >From: "Tony Stillman"
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >Reply-To: discussion@nsrca.org
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >To:
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >Subject: Re: bureaucratic organization!
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:44:31 -0500
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >Troy:
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >One correction. NSRCA proposals do NOT get an automatic
pass on the
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>initial vote.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >This changed about 6 years ago. As a matter of fact, An
NSRCA past
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>President, Rick Allison, spent long hours writing a proposal to
help
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>counteract this change. However, it ended up being thrown out
by the AMA
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Exec. Counsel.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >I am in total support of ANY AMA member sending in
proposals. Past
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>surveys prove that NSRCA can't think of everything that needs
to be done.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>Many things can be missed, or not even thought of. It is also
very easy to
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>just sit back and let NSRCA handle everything. Don't do that!
That's the
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>problem with the "silent majority" of our country now! We don't
vote, and so
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>we end up with what we get.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >It takes nerve to stand up for your ideas. Good job, Troy.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >Tony Stillman
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >Radio South
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >3702 N. Pace Blvd.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >Pensacola, FL 32505
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >www.radiosouthrc.com
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>> >
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV></DIV><BR clear=all>
<HR>
Protect your PC - <A href="http://g.msn.com/8HMWEN/2024">Click here</A> for
McAfee.com VirusScan Online </BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>