[From nobody Sun Nov 21 21:39:54 2004 Received: from mc4-f8.law16.hotmail.com ([65.54.237.143]) by mc4-s1.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Sat, 2 Nov 2002 04:58:00 -0800 Received: from mail.nxs.net ([198.144.160.60]) by mc4-f8.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Sat, 2 Nov 2002 04:58:00 -0800 Received: from vs.mail.nxs.net (unverified [198.144.160.64]) by nxs.net (Rockliffe SMTPRA 5.2.4) with SMTP id <B0043019765@mail.nxs.net> for <discussion@nsrca.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 07:58:26 -0500 Received: from mx1a.mail.nxs.net ([198.144.167.162]) by vs.mail.nxs.net (NAVGW 2.5.2.12) with SMTP id M2002110207515115701 for <discussion@nsrca.org>; Sat, 02 Nov 2002 07:51:51 -0500 Received: (qmail 11689 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2002 12:57:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kingcrab.nrl.navy.mil) (132.250.32.72) by mx1a.mail.nxs.net with SMTP for <discussion@nsrca.org>; 2 Nov 2002 12:57:53 -0000 Received: from esp022.kingcrab.nrl.navy.mil (c4imax-8.nrl.navy.mil [132.250.32.238]) by kingcrab.nrl.navy.mil (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id gA2Cvnd8017033 for <discussion@nsrca.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 07:57:49 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021102075541.00a350d0@kingcrab.nrl.navy.mil> X-Sender: wendt@kingcrab.nrl.navy.mil X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 07:57:38 -0500 To: discussion@nsrca.org From: Mark Wendt <wendt@kingcrab.nrl.navy.mil> Subject: RE: WAS - KFactor Now "Members" In-Reply-To: <LPBBKFHFIFFMDMIEEANDIEEKDDAA.weedon@wwnet.net> References: <NABBKBCPOPNIIFMBCHJNMEKJEGAA.gene.maurice@attbi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Reply-To: discussion@nsrca.org Sender: discussion-request@nsrca.org Return-Path: middletn@cfw.com X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Nov 2002 12:58:00.0559 (UTC) FILETIME=[792A47F0:01C2826F] <html> Tom,<br><br> <x-tab>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</x-tab>I mentioned the $38 contest report once before and got my head handed to me on a platter.&nbsp; Guess it's extremely important in some circles, even though the information is usually well dated and would have been served up better on the web site.&nbsp; But what do I know?<br><br> Mark<br><br> <br> At 06:11 AM 11/2/02 -0500, you wrote:<br> <blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="verdana">Gene,</font><br> Raise the dues to $45 and see what happens. It's called &quot;economics&quot;. Every young freshman in Business College knows about the &quot;Cost v.s. Quantity&quot; charts. Eight dollars dosen't mean much to you or me, but to the large number of inactive members that we used to have, that supported us with their dues, it meant they no longer saw the need to rejoin, and didn't. Further, we have some on this list (I'll leave unnamed) who haven't renewed in some time, because they just can't justify $38 to recieve a monthly contest report.<br> Tom W.&nbsp; </blockquote></html> ]