<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2716.2200" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>HAHAHAHA</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Damn Gray I'm about to fall over!!!!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I find it sick that MA is cutting the pattern
column to bi monthly because *ahem* "nobody is interested". Well DUH!!! 100
pages of nothing but park fliers and junk ARFs and useless reviews of said junk.
Please. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>When's the last time you saw a pattern plane on the
cover of MA? I'm thinking....I honestly can't remember. I bet half the people
see that Andy jesky ad and say "whut kinda plane izzat? Does it 3 dee? Don't luk
like no edge..."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I also find it amusing that in the latest MA, they
are talking about an online magazie and they are going to push guess what? The
new exhilirating rage of R/C....PARK FLIERS!!! Gosh, I just can't contain
myself. I mean, they're ok, they're cute, nothing against them, but they are
cutting pattern out of the picture and replacing it with a serious push towards
PARK FLIERS???? Does this mean the AMA is sick of trying to help us keep fields
and wants everyone to just start flying in the back yard????</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>And here I thought the AMA pres was an ex-pattern
pilot, and a pretty darned good one in his day. Did someone drop something on
his head? Has Dave Brown gone completely insane? </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Ok that was my rant for the year. Mild, but
necessary. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>-Mike Hester</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=gfowler@raytheon.com href="mailto:gfowler@raytheon.com">Gray E
Fowler</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:24
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: Weight Limit-really
marketing/popularity/etc</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>Like Buddy mentioned its the
magazines, not some concerted effort by IMAC to market sportsman. I do not
believe I have ever seen anything from IMAC, but every model mag has either a
scale warbird OR a scale .40 IMAC plane on the cover. Real IMAC planes are
ONLY shown on covers of anything in the hover position, and we all know how
important that is(speaking of that , perhaps someone should mention to the
self proclaimed #1 pattern supply place that perhaps a new photo would be in
order to appease us-my personal choice would be of an Aries).</FONT> <BR><FONT
face=sans-serif size=2>Perhaps a Pattern marketing effort could help, but
"IMAC style" became popular because the magazines are all in a vicious butt
sniffing mode to get out the latest reveiw of the NEW 60 sized IMAC type
ARF-gotta be an ARF or no one will buy it right? Why this frenzy I have no
idea, but it is not IMAC marketing (unless there is some serious under the
table stuff-but I honestly think if anyone is paying money its gotta be the
Chinese).</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>PS-what the RC world
really needs the mags to do is give us one more review on the NEW .40 P-51
ARF, complete with genuine imitation exhaust stacks for more realistic runway
fly-bys. Report on how the first take -off was...did it pull right and require
left rudder-I gotta know.....</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif
size=2><BR>Just an opinion<BR><BR><BR>Gray Fowler<BR>Principal Chemical
Engineer<BR>Composites Engineering</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>