<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<P>Ron </P>
<P>I stand corrected.</P>
<P>And is it right that the correct description should be That if the Annex System is approved by AMA then the new Masters pattern change request submitted to AMA will be voided or withdrawn as a non issue as far as AMA is concerned, and the new masters pattern for 2005 will be decided by NSRCA in the manner selected and approved by the membership?</P>
<P>Buddy <BR><BR></P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>>From: Ron Van Putte <VANPUTTE@NUC.NET>
<DIV></DIV>>Reply-To: vanputte@nuc.net
<DIV></DIV>>To: discussion@nsrca.org
<DIV></DIV>>Subject: Re: rules change decodeing
<DIV></DIV>>Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:23:15 -0600
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>Buddy Brammer's summary of the survey results and the rule change
<DIV></DIV>>proposals appears correct to me, except that he wrote, "Change the
<DIV></DIV>>masters sequence as approved in question 28". This sequence would
<DIV></DIV>>only be THE Master sequence if the proposal for it passes and the
<DIV></DIV>>Annex proposal fails. If the Annex proposal passes, the NSRCA has
<DIV></DIV>>the option of inserting a different sequence in the Annex for the
<DIV></DIV>>Master class.
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>Ron Van Putte
<DIV></DIV>>
<DIV></DIV>>=====================================
<DIV></DIV>># To be removed from this list, send a message to #
<DIV></DIV>>discussion-request@nsrca.org
<DIV></DIV>># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
<DIV></DIV>>#
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Add photos to your e-mail with <a href="http://g.msn.com/8HMPEN/2022">MSN 8.</a> Get 2 months FREE*.</html>