<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Lance:
<br>Now I get it. (Hadn't had my second cup of coffee!<G>)
That is an interesting question. Im going to ponder. Bill Glaze
<p>s.vannostrand@kodak.com wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>
<br><font face="sans-serif"><font size=-1>Bill,</font></font>
<br><font face="sans-serif"><font size=-1>I agree that pattenr designs
don't meet the rules of IMAC or TOC. This is because these groups
must model full scale designs. My question was not aimed at the modeling
community. I wonder why full scale designers don't enlarge pattern
designs. Once a full scale pilot flew a 25 foot wingspan Aries, then
a model version could be flown in IMAC. But the question is, why
aren't pattern designs used in full scale??</font></font>
<p><font face="sans-serif"><font size=-1>--Lance</font></font></blockquote>
</html>