<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4912.300" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Ron, after reading Eric's input, maybe Steve is
trying to ensure that the Committee does not vote down your proposal
incorrectly. By that I mean erroneously on content, NOT Merit. If that is true
it seems that they ( the AMA Board members )should respond with their
concerns,and guidance, and give you a window to revise your proposal to
accommodate any valid concerns. The input was rather brief, and would
probably need fleshing out for NSRCA to implement it
properly. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I would be willing to help respond, if that is the
case, so we can resolve any perceived concerns they have, and give the
Committee an input that is only evaluated on it's Merit, and not voted
down because of perceived content/deficiencies. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I do not how long a window they( the Board
) would give you, but feel they would be reasonable. All you need is
to be given a chance to respond to their inputs, submit an updated input,and
then they ( the Board ) ensure an early opportunity for the
Committee to get it evaluated, and voted on--on it's
Merits.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Jerry</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>