<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<P>If you want it to snap better you don't cut the ailerons. I.e. move em 3" inward. - Besides, I wouldn't cut the wingtips. I'd rather use the same or even a smaller chord at the tip for the reduced wingspan. <BR><BR>Urs</P>
<P>NSRCA 3069</P>
<P> </P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>----Original Message Follows----
<DIV></DIV>From: "Weimer, Claude" <CWEIMER@WILKINSON-MFG.COM>
<DIV></DIV>Reply-To: discussion@nsrca.org
<DIV></DIV>To: <DISCUSSION@NSRCA.ORG>
<DIV></DIV>Subject: Alerons
<DIV></DIV>Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:01:45 -0600
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>I am in the process of building a second Omen and I am cutting three inches off each win tip. I am reducing the wing area thinking the airplane will snap a little better. I am asking for opinions on the ailerons. Should I use the same aileron dimensions and just move the aileron inward? Or should I cut three inches of the tip of the aileron and place it the same distance out from the fuselage? Your thoughts on this will be appreciated.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>Claude Weimer
<DIV></DIV>NSRCA 946
<DIV></DIV>====================================# To be removed from this list, send a message to
<DIV></DIV># discussion-request@nsrca.org
<DIV></DIV># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
<DIV></DIV>#
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr> <a href="http://g.msn.com/8HMPEN/2015">the new MSN 8</a> and get 2 months FREE*</html>