<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Dean,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">That's why steppers are not the best fit in this application. However, optical encoders could be a better solution than pots. Aren't these available in small enough size?</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">--Lance</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>"Dean Pappas" <d.pappas@kodeos.com></b></font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: discussion-request@nsrca.org</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">03/27/2003 11:40 AM</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to discussion</font>
<br>
<td><font size=1 face="Arial"> </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> To: <discussion@nsrca.org></font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> cc: </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> Subject: RE: Pot-less servos</font></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">Mike,<br>
A stepper motor is a kissing cousin to the present generation brushless motors. Several sets of windings are popwered in rotating sequence, kinda like a 3-phase AC motor. If the sequence is reversed, it rotates the other way. Each run through the sequence corresponds to an angle. 100-position per rev steppers are common, but we would likely use a coarser one and gears. The motor can hold position one of two ways: steppers "cog" by design, so when powered down, there is a certain amount of breakout torque required to turn the output shaft. If you power the winding(s) that correspond to the present position, then you get great holding torque, but at currents similar to a DC motor at stall. If a critical torque figure, that is related to the desired motor speed, is never exceeded, then control is open loop: you count steps, both left and right forever. You need a home position (usually optical like John said) to make the position information absolute, rather than rela!
tive. For the kind of reliability we need, one home position, near neutral will not do! You end up needing a position feedback element, anyway.<br>
Dean<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Michael Ramsey [mailto:michaelr@flying-models.com]<br>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 9:32 AM<br>
To: discussion@nsrca.org<br>
Subject: Re: Pot-less servos<br>
<br>
<br>
It's just a motor right? But a step motor moves in increments of measure. Is<br>
that technology "pot-less". I've only heard about them, but have wondered<br>
how they might work for R/C use.<br>
<br>
Michael...<br>
<br>
<br>
----- Original Message -----<br>
From: "Dean Pappas" <d.pappas@kodeos.com><br>
To: <discussion@nsrca.org><br>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 5:05 PM<br>
Subject: RE: Pot-less servos<br>
<br>
<br>
What about stepper motors?<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Michael Ramsey [mailto:michaelr@flying-models.com]<br>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 5:03 PM<br>
To: discussion@nsrca.org<br>
Subject: Re: Pot-less servos<br>
<br>
<br>
Does anyone know anything about "step" motors?<br>
<br>
Michael...<br>
<br>
<br>
----- Original Message -----<br>
From: "Bill Glaze" <billglaze@triad.rr.com><br>
To: <discussion@nsrca.org><br>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 5:40 PM<br>
Subject: Re: Pot-less servos<br>
<br>
<br>
> Remember the Bonner Mailbox? Didn't have a potentiomenter; didn't need<br>
one!<br>
> Bill Glaze<br>
><br>
> Dean Pappas wrote:<br>
><br>
> > Hi John,<br>
> > Pot-less servos are our history! The old KPS-9 had a variable cap, and<br>
F&M sold a servo back in the same time period with a variable L-R<br>
multivibrator, called the Magnevac. But you remember that, don't you!<br>
> > Back as a fresh-out I wedged an optical unit into the variable cap<br>
housing of a KPS-9.<br>
> > I have no idea where it is, but I don't think I tossed it.<br>
> > Dean<br>
> ><br>
> > -----Original Message-----<br>
> > From: John Ferrell [mailto:johnferrell@earthlink.net]<br>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 6:19 PM<br>
> > To: discussion@nsrca.org<br>
> > Subject: Re: New Futaba wc?<br>
> ><br>
> > Pot-less servos may be nearer than you think. Clarostat has rotary hall<br>
> > effect devices available now.<br>
> ><br>
> > John Ferrell<br>
> > 6241 Phillippi Rd<br>
> > Julian NC 27283<br>
> > Phone: (336)685-9606<br>
> > Dixie Competition Products<br>
> > NSRCA 479 AMA 4190 W8CCW<br>
> > "My Competition is Not My Enemy"<br>
> ><br>
> > ----- Original Message -----<br>
> > From: "Koenig, Tom" <Tom.Koenig@actewagl.com.au><br>
> > To: <discussion@nsrca.org><br>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 5:52 PM<br>
> > Subject: RE: New Futaba wc?<br>
> ><br>
> > ><br>
> > > Thanks Dean...now I'll be disappointed for a while. Maybe they will do<br>
it<br>
> > > when they introduce their 'potless' servo's.<G> I too have been<br>
waiting<br>
> > for<br>
> > > these! I guess I'll keep dreaming.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > -----Original Message-----<br>
> > > From: Dean Pappas [mailto:d.pappas@kodeos.com]<br>
> > ><br>
> ><br>
> > =====================================<br>
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to<br>
> > # discussion-request@nsrca.org<br>
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.<br>
> > #<br>
> ><br>
> > ====================================# To be removed from this list, send<br>
a message to<br>
> > # discussion-request@nsrca.org<br>
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.<br>
> > #<br>
><br>
> =====================================<br>
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to<br>
> # discussion-request@nsrca.org<br>
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.<br>
> #<br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
=====================================<br>
# To be removed from this list, send a message to<br>
# discussion-request@nsrca.org<br>
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.<br>
#<br>
<br>
============# To be removed from this list, send a message to<br>
# discussion-request@nsrca.org<br>
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.<br>
#<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
=====================================<br>
# To be removed from this list, send a message to <br>
# discussion-request@nsrca.org<br>
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.<br>
#<br>
<br>
====================================# To be removed from this list, send a message to <br>
# discussion-request@nsrca.org<br>
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.<br>
#<br>
<br>
<br>
</font>
<br>
<br>