<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">In a message dated 5/4/2003 12:22:07 AM Eastern Daylight Time, jed241@msn.com writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Subj:<B>Re: 4 pt roll </B><BR>
Date:5/4/2003 12:22:07 AM Eastern Daylight Time<BR>
From:<A HREF="mailto:jed241@msn.com">jed241@msn.com</A><BR>
Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A><BR>
To:<A HREF="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A><BR>
<I>Sent from the Internet </I><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
New at the judging game…<BR>
<BR>
********To re-phrase what I think I read. As a judge; if the roll rate is so <BR>
fast that I am not sure that all points existed as hestiations, then I <BR>
can issue a downgrade for a missed point or points. A missed point <BR>
would be a major downgrade.***********<BR>
<BR>
If even one point is missed (no hesitation), would this warrant a zero vs major downgrade as it is not a 4 point roll? Is this view too critical for the four point roll?<BR>
<BR>
Curious…<BR>
<BR>
Larry<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
Larry,<BR>
<BR>
A missed point is not a zero in the four point roll. It's a major downgrade. The amount of deduction is in the book<BR>
<BR>
Matt K</FONT></HTML>