<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:BUDDYonRC@aol.com">BUDDYonRC@aol.com</a> wrote:
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid162.2376d7ce.2c4c3a89@aol.com"><font
face="arial,helvetica"><font color="#8000ff" size="2"
family="SANSSERIF" face="Arial" lang="0">I don't think we as a group would
have a problem finding judges either.<br>
I don't understand your comment That you would only consider 20% what makes
Intermediate and Advanced any different from Masters and FAI unless you are
saying that the Masters and FAI classes will only include 20% in the finals
next year.<br>
</font></font></blockquote>
<br>
That's exactly what I am saying. If I have my way, it will be written in
the NSRCA-approved plan for next years Nats that 20% of the entrants in a
class (rounded up) will be in the finals, no matter how long and hard the
entrants lobby for more. A five-hour+ finals is way too long. Some people
have argued that we should conduct our Nats as close to the F3A Sporting
Code as is reasonable. If 20% in the finals is enough for the Sporting Code,
it's enough for our Nats.<br>
<br>
Ron<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>