<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
Wayne Galligan wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid01dc01c3578f$62ba9240$19931c0a@gaw2ksrv02">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1170" name="GENERATOR">
<style></style>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Well now that the Prophecy is gone and
its replacement is near ready I and I have considerable time now on the
Aries with digitals I am going to use the coreless servos in the new airship(mainly
cause I is getting cash strapped). I will or should probably be able to
tell the difference if all of this is true. If I do realize the difference
then its time to ante up and get some more digitals. </font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">The main crux of my question though...
Aren't std corelss servo's less severe on battery drain then digitals?.</font></div>
<div> </div>
</font></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
You need to have 'apples-to-apples' comparisons. There are standard servos
with standard motors and standard servos with coreless motors. Similarly,
there are digital servos with standard motors and digital servos with coreless
motors. My estimate of the order of increasing battery consumption would
be standard servos with standard motors, then standard servos with coreless
motors, then digital servos with standard motors and finally, digital servos
with coreless motors. However, as the "Pentagon-dwelling weenies" used to
say when I was an Air Force engineer, "But I could be wrong."<br>
<br>
Ron Van Putte<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>