<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
Eric:<br>
Thanks much. I just knew that I wasn't mistaken about something that was
so dear to my heart.<G><br>
As far as implementation, would it not have been possible to submit the other
class(es) proposed schedules just as was done with Masters? In other words,
right alongside Masters for consideration by AMA? If this was, in fact possible,
does anybody have any idea why it wasn't done?<br>
<br>
Bill Glaze<br>
<br>
<br>
Henderson,Eric wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="midE738E219A3E261479F5702D7EBBD3C57946718@bobcat.ent.gartner.com">
<pre wrap="">Bill,
The 2002 survey and the implementation of its results fell on my shoulders. Masters(404) had several schedules designed and available that were shown for your vote. It was expected that 404 would change every three years, as per the 1999 survey.
I personally asked the question "Should we also change 401-402 on a three year basis?" You all voted yes. Now we have to come up with a way to do that.
As Ron states, the Annex system is the way we can do it.
Regards,
Eric.
P.S. We posted all the results in several places, but I will send you a copy of the word file. - E.
-----Original Message-----
From: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org">discussion-request@nsrca.org</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org">mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org</a>]On Behalf Of Ron Van Putte
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:58 PM
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</a>
Subject: Re: Schedules
Bill Glaze wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I noted that only the AMA Masters class seem to be applying for a new
schedule.
One of the reasons for change was stated as being that a majority of
the membership voted for change.
The same vote tabulation stated that the other classes also wished to
see a schedule change.
Is this currently being worked on?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Proposals for changes to the current 401 - 403 maneuver schedules were
not submitted to the AMA by NSRCA. However, IF the NSRCA Annex proposal
passes, we will have the option of changes to all maneuver schedules as
frequently as annually.
I don't remember that a majority 'voted' for changes to schedules other
than the Master class. Even so, any AMA member can submit a change
proposal. I have submitted several as an individual over the years.
One was for the takeoff direction being the pilot's option. I
submitted it three times before it finally passed on the third try, but
it did pass. So, individual proposals do get through. People need to
make proposals if they see the need for change and not rely on someone
doing it for them.
Ron Van Putte
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Thanks
Bill Glaze
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to #
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org">discussion-request@nsrca.org</a>
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org">discussion-request@nsrca.org</a>
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
==================================# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org">discussion-request@nsrca.org</a>
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>