<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
Steve:<br>
I agree with all you say, but consider for a moment those of us who for
one reason or another, find ourselves in a destination class other than Master.<br>
And yes, there are more than just me in this situation; there are, in fact,
quite a few. As for me, I have several alternatives, none at the present
time being particularly pleasant.<br>
This typing with one hand is tiresome; I'll keep it to the minimum until
I get full mobility back.<br>
<br>
Bill Glaze<br>
<br>
RC Steve Sterling wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="midLBEJLINNOCPHDMPMJJPEKEEIDAAA.rcsteve@tcrcm.org">
<title></title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name="GENERATOR">
<div><span class="899034800-25102003"><font face="Arial"
color="#0000ff" size="2">Maybe its more like the Masters folks got together
and took care of their own needs, and us lower class guys did nothing, waiting
for others to do it. If we wanted a change, we should have initiated it
ourselves. For me, putting the immelman/snap back into intermediate will
stretch me another year, then it will be time to move up anyway.</font></span></div>
<div><span class="899034800-25102003"></span> </div>
<div><span class="899034800-25102003"><font face="Arial"
color="#0000ff" size="2">Us lower class guys get fresh schedules by moving
up. Masters is defined a destination class, and they need change to keep
from getting bored.</font></span></div>
<blockquote>
<div class="OutlookMessageHeader" dir="ltr" align="left"><font
face="Tahoma" size="2">-----Original Message-----<br>
<b>From:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org">discussion-request@nsrca.org</a> [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org">mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org</a>]<b>On
Behalf Of </b>Bill Glaze<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, October 24, 2003 2:43 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> NSRCA discussion<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: schedules<br>
<br>
</font></div>
All:<br>
It is interesting, however, to note that, while there wasn't "time" to
get new schedules together for classes other than Masters, there still
existed enough "time" to put that one together. (And, of course, being
much more involved, it would consume more "time.") The intentions of
those folks in charge of the asylum<G> wouldn't have been nearly
as suspect, if the only new sequence to be submitted was, say, Advanced
or Sportsman. I tend toward believing that, regardless of the survey
results, there is a cadre of folks that believe the classes other than
FAI and Masters just don't warrant the attention required.<br>
And, please believe me, this is not any kind of a slam at Ron, but you
note that his idea of the "Old Geezers Class" mentions only Masters. BTW:
Ron may have been joking, but I feel that his idea has more than a little
merit.<br>
Perhaps the other classes need an advocate specific to them? Or an ombudsman
whose efforts would encompass everyone except the top classes?<br>
<br>
Bill Glaze<br>
<br>
george kennie wrote:<br>
<blockquote cite="mid3F996423.45DF9738@gis.net" type="cite">Hey Bill,
<br>
This one's not even tough to figure out! The administrative people were
all coming from the ranks of the Master's class at the time the survey
was done and didn't want to be bothered with us peons. They were only
interested in fixing what they specifically were affected by and the
rest of us could be accomodated at a time convenient to their agenda,
which somehow was thrown into disarray by the everyday hum-drum of life.
<br>
Not everybody is as selfless as your bud John Ferrill! <br>
Georgie
<p>Bill Glaze wrote: </p>
<blockquote type="CITE">Eric: <br>
Thanks much. I just knew that I wasn't mistaken about something that
was so dear to my heart.<G> <br>
As far as implementation, would it not have been possible to submit
the other class(es) proposed schedules just as was done with Masters?
In other words, right alongside Masters for consideration by AMA?
If this was, in fact possible, does anybody have any idea why it wasn't
done?
<p>Bill Glaze <br>
</p>
<p>Henderson,Eric wrote: </p>
<blockquote
cite="midE738E219A3E261479F5702D7EBBD3C57946718@bobcat.ent.gartner.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Bill,
The 2002 survey and the implementation of its results fell on my shoulders. Masters(404) had several schedules designed and available that were shown for your vote. It was expected that 404 would change every three years, as per the 1999 survey.
I personally asked the question "Should we also change 401-402 on a three year basis?" You all voted yes. Now we have to come up with a way to do that.
As Ron states, the Annex system is the way we can do it.
Regards,
Eric.
P.S. We posted all the results in several places, but I will send you a copy of the word file. - E.
-----Original Message-----
From: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org">discussion-request@nsrca.org
</a>[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org">mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org</a>]On Behalf Of Ron Van Putte
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 5:58 PM
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org
</a>Subject: Re: Schedules
Bill Glaze wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I noted that only the AMA Masters class seem to be applying for a new
schedule.
One of the reasons for change was stated as being that a majority of
the membership voted for change.
The same vote tabulation stated that the other classes also wished to
see a schedule change.
Is this currently being worked on?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Proposals for changes to the current 401 - 403 maneuver schedules were
not submitted to the AMA by NSRCA. However, IF the NSRCA Annex proposal
passes, we will have the option of changes to all maneuver schedules as
frequently as annually.
I don't remember that a majority 'voted' for changes to schedules other
than the Master class. Even so, any AMA member can submit a change
proposal. I have submitted several as an individual over the years.
One was for the takeoff direction being the pilot's option. I
submitted it three times before it finally passed on the third try, but
it did pass. So, individual proposals do get through. People need to
make proposals if they see the need for change and not rely on someone
doing it for them.
Ron Van Putte
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Thanks
Bill Glaze
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to #
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org">discussion-request@nsrca.org
</a># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org">discussion-request@nsrca.org
</a># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
==================================# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org">discussion-request@nsrca.org
</a># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>