<DIV> The public has spoken and they like the ROG's and landings so what's to debate? I for 1 like the maneuvers. I'm tired of the judging thing why don't we just get rid of them? Let everyone judge themselves. That's what we do here in Chicago and everyone goes home happy and wants to come back for more. Mike<BR><BR><B><I>"Henderson,Eric" <Eric.Henderson@gartner.com></I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">This how those who cared to vote in the 2004 NSRCA survey, voted on landings and Take-off's for 2005 rules proposal changes.<BR><BR><BR>Question-10<BR>Should the Take off and Landing be scored in 401.<BR>YES = 152____ NO = 26_____ RESULT = NO CHANGE____<BR><BR>Question-16<BR>Should take off and landings be scored in Intermediate<BR>YES = 156____ NO = 25_____ RESULT = NO CHANGE____<BR><BR>Question-19 <BR>Should takeoff and landings be scored in Advanced <BR>YES = 135____ NO = 39_____ RESULT = NO CHANGE____<BR><BR>Question-24<BR>Should takeoff and landings be scored in Masters <BR>YES = 106____ NO = 60_____ RESULT = NO CHANGE____<BR><BR>As you can see the majority still wanted to have them scored. The vote weakened a little in Masters but it still was strong for them both to be scored.<BR><BR>I have noticed a strong affinity, maybe even affection for these two maneuvers. Some believe
that they strengthen a pilots flying skill etc. I think that more planes get hurt trying to land in bad conditions and on cruddy runways that any skill bonus. Just my opinion so please don't get all religious on me.<BR><BR>Regards,<BR><BR>Eric.<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>====================================# To be removed from this list, send a message to<BR># discussion-request@nsrca.org<BR># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.<BR>#<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree">Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard</a>