<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=153202119-15112003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Can
someone please explain to me why the rules proposal, submission, voting,
approval, and implementation process takes so long. There is nearly 2 1/2
years from conception to birth. Hell, elephant gestation is only 22
months!!!! </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=153202119-15112003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=153202119-15112003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>I'm
not taking shots at anyone, just curious why it takes so
long.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=153202119-15112003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=153202119-15112003>
<P><FONT size=2>Gene Maurice<BR>gene.maurice@comcast.net<BR>Plano, TX<BR>AMA
3408<BR>NSRCA 877 </FONT></P></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> discussion-request@nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org]<B>On Behalf Of </B>Lance Van
Nostrand<BR><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, November 15, 2003 12:42 PM<BR><B>To:</B>
discussion@nsrca.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: Rule Change Survey
Results<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I wonder now if Georgie is right in his
assessment of the politics. This is an amazingly odd comment by the
chairman of the contest board about the NSRCA rules survey:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> "From 2002. An old survey before the rules proposals were
available to the membership. In my mind I am not sure it is still
valid. Do not think there was a "2004" survey or 2003 for that matter.<?/smaller> <BR>John<?/smaller> <BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>As we have learned the hard way, the voting
occurring this April 2004 is based on rules proposals wording finalized in
Sept 2002 and that were approved in July 2003 to be on the ballot in April
2004. Any member surveys after Sept 2002 are moot. We shouldn't
discount the survey since it is the only official accounting of member opinion
collected before the cutoff. The April vote is the opportunity to
determine if the proper proposals made long ago should become
rules.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> If John feels the 2002 survey is no
longer valid, on what is he basing that opinion? Seems to me all the
evidence shows that the 2002 survey results are still valid.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>--Lance</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=vanputte@cox.net href="mailto:vanputte@cox.net">Ron Van Putte</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, November 14, 2003 11:05
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Fwd: Rule Change Survey
Results</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>NSRCA Discussion List members: For your information, below is
an interchange I had this morning with John Fuqua, R/C Aerobatics contest
board chairman regarding potential takeoff/landing rule changes, extracted
from the 2002 NSRCA member survey .<BR><BR>Ron Van Putte<BR><BR>Begin
forwarded message:<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><B><?color><?param 0000,0000,0000>From: <?/color></B>Fuqua
John D Contr AAC/YAA <john.fuqua@eglin.af.mil><BR><B><?color><?param 0000,0000,0000>Date:
<?/color></B>November 14, 2003 8:49:15 AM PST<BR><B><?color><?param 0000,0000,0000>To: <?/color></B>"'Ron Van
Putte'" <vanputte@cox.net><BR><B><?color><?param 0000,0000,0000>Cc: <?/color></B>"'Tony Stillman'" <tony@radiosouthrc.com><BR><B><?color><?param 0000,0000,0000>Subject:
<?/color>RE: Rule Change Survey Results<BR></B><BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?color><?param 0000,0000,FFFF><?smaller>OK.
This was the result of a personal initiative to submit Discussion List
discussion to me and it is not a official NSRCA input.
Duly noted. I choose not to forward THAT to the
board. Again, I will forward an NSRCA input on the rules proposals
should I receive one.<?/smaller><?/color><?/fontfamily><BR> <BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?color><?param 0000,0000,FFFF><?smaller>John<?/smaller><?/color><?/fontfamily><BR><?smaller>-----Original
Message-----<?/smaller><BR><B><?smaller>From:<?/smaller></B><?smaller>Ron
Van Putte [mailto:vanputte@cox.net]<?/smaller><BR><B><?smaller>Sent:<?/smaller></B><?smaller>Friday,
November 14, 2003 10:41 AM<?/smaller><BR><B><?smaller>To:<?/smaller></B><?smaller>Fuqua John D
Contr
AAC/YAA<?/smaller><BR><B><?smaller>Subject:<?/smaller></B><?smaller>Re:
Rule Change Survey Results<?/smaller><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>On Nov 14,
2003, at 8:26 AM, Fuqua John D Contr AAC/YAA wrote:<BR><BR><BR><BR><?smaller>Do not know what precipitated this
particular input, but I do not want to get into piecemeal NSRCA inputs to
the Board. If NSRCA wants to provide a comprehensive reccommendation
on all proposals, I will forward it to the Board.<?/smaller>
<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>It was the topic of considerable discussion on
the NSRCA Discussion List. It was suggested that the results of the survey
be forwarded to the Board and I agreed to do
it.<BR><BR><BR><BR>Ron<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><?smaller>-----Original
Message-----<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>From: Fuqua John D Contr AAC/YAA<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:21
AM<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>To: 'Ron Van Putte'<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>Cc: 'Tony Stillman'<?/smaller>
<BR><BR><?smaller>Subject: RE: Rule Change Survey Results<?/smaller>
<BR><BR><?smaller>From 2002. An old survey before the rules
proposals were available to the membership. In my mind I am not sure
it is still valid. Do not think there was a "2004" survey or 2003
for that matter.<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>John<?/smaller> <BR><BR><BR><?smaller>-----Original Message-----<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>From: Ron Van Putte
[<?color><?param 0000,0000,EEEE>mailto:vanputte@cox.net<?/color>]<?/smaller>
<BR><BR><?smaller>Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:16 AM<?/smaller>
<BR><BR><?smaller>To: Fuqua John D Contr AAC/YAA<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>Cc: discussion@nsrca.org; Tony Stillman<?/smaller>
<BR><BR><?smaller>Subject: Rule Change Survey Results<?/smaller>
<BR><BR><BR><BR><?smaller>John - I have agreed to forward the results of
an NSRCA survey on the<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>takeoff/landing rule
change proposal, which were extracted from a 2002<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>K-Factor. Here they are:<?/smaller>
<BR><BR><BR><?smaller>"This how those who cared to vote in the 2004 NSRCA
survey, voted on<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>landings and Take-off's for
2005 rules proposal changes.<?/smaller> <BR><BR><BR><?smaller>Question-10<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>Should the
Take off and Landing be scored in 401.<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>YES =
152____ NO =
26_____ RESULT
= NO CHANGE____<?/smaller> <BR><BR><BR><BR><?smaller>Question-16<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>Should
take off and landings be scored in Intermediate<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>YES =
156____ NO =
25_____ RESULT = NO
CHANGE____<?/smaller> <BR><BR><BR><BR><?smaller>Question-19<?/smaller>
<BR><BR><?smaller>Should takeoff and landings be scored in Advanced<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>YES =
135____ NO =
39_____ RESULT = NO
CHANGE____<?/smaller> <BR><BR><BR><BR><?smaller>Question-24<?/smaller>
<BR><BR><?smaller>Should takeoff and landings be scored in Masters<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>YES =
106____ NO =
60_____ RESULT = NO
CHANGE____<?/smaller> <BR><BR><BR><BR><?smaller>As you can see the
majority still wanted to have them scored. The vote<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>weakened a little in Masters but it still was strong for
them both to<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>be scored."<?/smaller>
<BR><BR><BR><BR><?smaller>As R/C Aerobatics Contest Board chairman, please
distribute the results<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>to the other board
members prior to the final vote on this proposal.<?/smaller>
<BR><BR><BR><BR><?smaller>Ron Van Putte<?/smaller> <BR><BR><?smaller>NSRCA
vice president<?/smaller>
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>