<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Tony:<br>
Not true about the "annex" system; in fact, AMA intended to put IMAC on
a 3 year cycle change to "regulate" our change of maneuver schedules.<br>
The BOD of IMAC felt that if AMA was allowed to do this, it would rip
the guts out of what IMAC stood for. And it would have. That is what
started the entire rebellion. As soon as we realized what they were
trying to do, (put our flight schedules AND our rules changes on a 3
year basis, like NSRCA has to put up with now) we got our wake up call
and put our collective heads together. Then, other good things began
to happen also. Like training a mule: first, find a good piece of 4 X
4............<br>
<br>
Bill Glaze<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Tony Stillman wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid002a01c3aebd$e79cc9d0$6401a8c0@tony">
<pre wrap="">John:
IMAC is not out of the control of AMA. They are a SIG, just like us.
However, they put in an annex maneuver system from the start, so they could
change schedules as they wanted. We received quite a bit more trouble from
the Contest Board when we wanted to install an Annex. It has not been
approved yet, but I think it will pass this time.
We can get things passed as emergency rule changes, should that need to
happen. Otherwise, we are in the control of AMA, who sets the rules.
Yes, it is a very slow system, but unless we completely break away from AMA,
we will have to work to change what we have now. Most people flying pattern
now have NO IDEA how much work it was to put on N-PAC's!
Tony Stillman
Radio South
3702 N. Pace Blvd.
Pensacola, FL 32505
1-800-962-7802
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.radiosouthrc.com">www.radiosouthrc.com</a>
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Ferrell" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:johnferrell@earthlink.net"><johnferrell@earthlink.net></a>
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org"><discussion@nsrca.org></a>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: Bigger issues--Long as usual from me
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">RE:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">The first contests with the current rules changes were in 2002 yet
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->8months
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">later the changes for the next cycle were due.....How can this be
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">evaluated
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">properly...I submit that it can't be properly evaluated. I know the
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->NSRCA
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">needs to be involved in the rules process.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">I do not propose anarchy, but I do think we need to do a reality check on
the subject. I know that IMAC is a dirty word here but when it comes to
competition they are leading the way. While we are looking at lead times
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->in
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">the area of many years, they are making box dimension adjustments in real
time. They tweak and try changes and the world does not end.
The AMA relationship to competition is changing from promotion of
competition to tolerating it. They are about one step away from forbidding
it. I cannot understand the reluctance of NSRCA to declare independence in
the same manner as the IMAC folks.
Both organizations are recognizing that the high dollar airplanes are
driving the membership numbers at the moment. It is a real problem. If and
when the IMAC starts promoting a set of classes limited to 80 inch
airplanes, pattern as we know it will be threatened. The real problem is
that it will take this discipline five years or more to respond to the
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->"IMAC
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Competition"!
Will Rogers said: "You have a choice. You can either deal with things as
they are or you can deal with things as they are not"!
John Ferrell
6241 Phillippi Rd
Julian NC 27283
Phone: (336)685-9606
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:johnferrell@earthlink.net">johnferrell@earthlink.net</a>
Dixie Competition Products
NSRCA 479 AMA 4190 W8CCW
"My Competition is Not My Enemy"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Troy Newman" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:troy_newman@msn.com"><troy_newman@msn.com></a>
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org"><discussion@nsrca.org></a>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 12:17 AM
Subject: Re: Bigger issues--Long as usual from me
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I'm not condemning your actions or the actions of anyone else....Rather
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">I'm
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">saying the current process is poor.
Its long and drawn out...I also know that the process caught us off
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->guard
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">this past cycle. There were so many huge changes the time before...We
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->were
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">still waiting for them to take effect. By the time the next cycle came
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->up
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">it
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">seems like there is a very short time to evaluate the changes made the
previous cycle...as in less than a single seasons flying and yet the CB
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">and
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">the AMA process takes 2+ years to do its work....
The first contests with the current rules changes were in 2002 yet
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->8months
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">later the changes for the next cycle were due.....How can this be
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">evaluated
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">properly...I submit that it can't be properly evaluated. I know the
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->NSRCA
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">needs to be involved in the rules process.
Just think we could do something better that's all.
TN
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org">discussion-request@nsrca.org</a>
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org">discussion-request@nsrca.org</a>
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>