<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Allen,
<br>I think Jerry raises a good point regarding the pot wear problem. That's
certainly something I had never considered and would probably stop me from
implementing the method even though I had recently done a fun-fly with
dual elevators servos. I really liked using the Ailevator function to get
equal travel and throws, but hearing that the settings may be subject to
change doesn't thrill me.
<br>As regards long cable runs, I have done about 3 or 4 planes with the
servos at the stab and the recvr in the canopy area without any glitching
and on a couple I didn't even twist them. I did try to make sure that they
were about 2-3 inches from the antenna wire.
<br>Georgie
<p>Alan Simmonds wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE> <span class=054291600-26112003><font face="Arial"><font size=-1><</span></font></font>My
current thinking is that I will still mount the servo in the same area
and go with cables.Very light and direct.<span class=054291600-26112003><font face="Arial"><font color="#0000FF"><font size=-1>> </font></font></font></span><span
class=054291600-26112003></span><span
class=054291600-26112003></span><span
class=054291600-26112003><font face="Arial"><font color="#0000FF"><font size=-1>Georgie</font></font></font></span><span
class=054291600-26112003><font face="Arial"><font color="#0000FF"><font size=-1>I
am also deliberating whether to use stab mounted elevator servos on my
next model but </span><span class=054291600-26112003>I'm curious about
how the geometry would work on a closed loop setup and still use a good
proportion of the servo rotation. Any thoughts?</font></font></font></span><span
class=054291600-26112003><font face="Arial"><font color="#0000FF"><font size=-1>Alan</font></font></font></span></blockquote>
</body>
</html>