<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Troy,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Tell us more about the contest and the
electric. I assume you didn't fly on Saturday because of the wind.
It was blowing so hard at my place Sunday morning that I didn't even check
Lancaster until 10 and then found out it was calm out there. Sounds like I
missed some fun.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Jim</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=troy_newman@msn.com href="mailto:troy_newman@msn.com">Troy Newman</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, February 10, 2004 10:39
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: What's a JR 9411SA
servo?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The 9411 is a mid sized servo. So it fits in the
stab just like it would in a wing. I didn't look closely at Tony's setup. I
know he is not using a matchbox. There is no need. Matchboxes are for using
multiple servos on each surface. Basically all a matchbox does is act a "Y"
harness that has subtrim, reversing, and end point adjustments in
it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>If you plug the two elevator servos into the RX
in different channels you already have these features. Especially in the 10X
as the dual elevator function is the simple flip of a software switch....then
subtrim the servos independently, and reversing as needed...then set the end
points and they are done.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Where the matchbox shines.....is when you are
running (4) servos per aileron.....Your RX only has 10 channels in it. So are
you going to use 8 channels just to mix your ailerons together?
NOPE...So the question comes which servos get Y harnessed to each other and do
you use (2) RX's and so on. The matchbox allows you to hook the entire wing
panel to a matchbox and set each servo up independently for center, rev,
Travel....then the match box just plug into one channel on the RX. Do the same
thing for the left wing and now your setup is not much more than a normal
pattern setup with only 2 ailerons servos as far as the TX is
concerned.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The Matchbox also has a neat feature where can
power the servos on it separately from the RX power source...So you could put
a switch and battery pack on the left wing, right wing, rudder, and elevator
on a big model like Quique's Yak 54 or the big H9 Ultimate Bipe.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The idea behind a matchbox is to make the complex
model easy to setup....it allows matching of servos that are connected to the
same channel in the RX. If you have a radio with dual elevator capability
there is no reason for a matchbox in this application.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I have seen H9 Funtana's with matchboxes on the
elevators....and I have seen 25% extra's with dual RX's......Our pattern
models are pretty simple in their layout. Even if using dual elevators....we
are already using dual aileron servos and our radios are already setup to do
it....both major radio manufacturers 9-10channel systems, the 8 channels, and
I think even some of the 6 channel systems are now capable of the dual
elevator setup and have been that way for years now.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I don't think it is better than the CF rod setup
I have been using....but if setup properly I think function is just as good.
As Tony has said the dual elevator servos are a pain in the behind as the
servo pots wear. The endpoints change the centers change. In talking with Tony
when he was flying Ty 2+2's with the dual elev setup he was changing servos
every 30 flights because the pots were starting to show wear. If this is
the case the then the setup time and pain in the behind of dual servos gets
old quick. A single servo is easier to change and setup because there is no
matching.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Tony's theory is the Electric is going to much
less servo wear...so the dual servos is no big deal. He isn't going to be
changing the servos for 10,000 flights.....LOL...actually I'm joking but the
electric has to be better on the servo pots. We'll see what happens. Also the
newer digital servos that we have today are way better on pot wear and
centering than the servos Tony was using back in the dark ages of
97'</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I know Quique uses dual elevator servos also. The
Smaragd and Partner will tend to have a forward CG if you use a single
servo up front and build them stock. So Tony just built the model as close to
the design intent for everything but the power system. It is a very impressive
model. I enjoyed flying it. Only got 2 flights on it but one was a contest
round of P-05.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Troy</FONT></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>