<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff">
"Completely Neutral" is the most complex descriptive condition that one
can conceptualize. There are so many variables, that there is only one
specific set that will approximate the required parameters to achieve the
"voila" condition.Change one thing and you no longer have "completely neutral".
<br>Not trying to be corrective here, just stating that in my experience
completely neutral is more than elusive, but somewhat attainable under
certain conditions.
<br>What I'm currently searching for is the correct force arrangement that
will give me a neutral airplane at the C.G. that I like to fly at. I would
like to fly an airplane that adapts to me not the other way around. Elusive?
Yeah! But attainable? At this point, I think maybe!
<br>Georgie
<br>
<br>
<p>Patternrules@aol.com wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE> In a message dated 2/12/2004 11:26:21 AM US
Eastern Standard Time, natpenton@centurytel.net writes:
<blockquote style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><font face="Arial"><font size=-1>For
an airplane that goes to the canopy in knife-edge most trim charts say
, after adjusting cg , to increase the wing incidence . My " theory " says
to decrease the wing incidence. What is your theory/experience ?</font></font></blockquote>
<b> What does the plane do in the down lines, if they are good you
could just mix in a little down elevator with rudder, for the knife edge.</b><b>
Nat, I would have thought that a guy that designed the Voo Doo Express
that was completely neutral, would have all the answers LOL.</b> <b><i><font face="Arial Baltic"><font size=-1>Steve
Maxwell</font></font></i></b></blockquote>
</body>
</html>