<DIV>
<DIV><BR>Has Tony Stillman, or anybody, done a review of the development, building and flight testing of the Panacea, or is it available on a Web-page? I was off list for a couple of weeks and might have missed it. </DIV>
<DIV>The Piedmont Temptation and Focus II seem to be getting a lot of well deserved attention here and at RCU. So far the the Focus II seems to be the logical choice, in terms of proven performance, all balsa ease of assembly and value for $. for a 2M and, likewise, the Quest, MK Star 90, or the Widebody 60 for a 90/120 option. </DIV>
<DIV>On the other hand, from the reviews and comments posted on RCU, the C.A. Eclipse seems to be a bit more complicated option, as it would seem to require quite a bit of modification to make it work. </DIV>
<DIV>It would be good to hear comments and reviews on the other U.S. designs: Panacea, Phenom, Aires and Titan. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Rodney Tanner</DIV>
<DIV>NSRCA #2096</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><B><I>Ron Van Putte <vanputte@cox.net></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR>On Feb 23, 2004, at 9:25 AM, Tony Quist wrote:<BR><BR>> I have a Focus, I am looking for a kit to build. I want something <BR>> more current then a python. Hydeaway, Smaragd, Temptation, basically <BR>> 2002-2003 designs. I figured there was someone out there that has a <BR>> kit that they just don’t have the time to build.<BR><BR>Why not try Tony Stillman's new Panacea? Mike and Maureen have the kit <BR>in production now. Contact them at Precision Aero Composites (662) 462 <BR>5480<BR><BR>Ron Van Putte<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mailtag_us/*http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools?tool=1">Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard</a> - Read only the mail you want.</a>