<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Don,
<br>Not absolutely certain here, but here's my logic.If you go through
all the maneuvers in the schedule you will find that not "ALL" the
maneuver descriptions reference the direction of all rolls, but the ones
that do are in agreement with the Aresti diagrams. Based upon this fact
it follows that when the description doesn't specify, the drawing is golden.
I think I remember last year that a similar question was raised regarding
a line which had a roll that reversed at some point and the direction was
in question. As I recall the answer was that when the description is silent
the Aresti takes precedence.
<br>Regarding the Golfball I would agree with your assessment of centering.
<br>Georgie<br>
<p>Don Szczur wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE><style></style>
<font face="Arial"><font size=-1>Hello,
sorry for bringing this up if its been covered already.</font></font> <font face="Arial"><font size=-1>Going
by memory but maneuver 2, discription says half square loop on corner
with 2 of 4's. The aresti diagram shows the 2 of 4's opposite direction.
Is this correct or roll directions optional.</font></font> <font face="Arial"><font size=-1>While
I'm at it, the upside down golf ball. Does the thing start at the center
(V) or is the crossover of the two half rolls at the center point (as drawn
in aresti)? I think its the later, but just want to double check.</font></font> <font face="Arial"><font size=-1>Thanks
much,</font></font><font face="Arial"><font size=-1>Don</font></font></blockquote>
</body>
</html>