<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face="MS Sans Serif" size=2>Ed....</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face="MS Sans Serif" size=2> Sounds great
... <U><FONT color=#ff0000>BUT... </FONT></U></FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face="MS Sans Serif" size=2>We have been down this time a few
times before over the years. Just different magnitudes and with internet is more
open forum for discussion. Some members have a different agenda and follow what
they feel is important. </FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face="MS Sans Serif" size=2> My
suggestion is to make those that vote and control the issues that guide this
SPORT have their voting record posted on this forum or on the NSRCA web site for
us to review and question the motives behind their decisions. Sort of like the
ribbing that goes on for sandbaggers to move up. It would either drive the
people underground or out of office. Both might be better than keep
repeating history. This is only MHO as lame as it may
be. </FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face="MS Sans Serif" size=2></FONT></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face="MS Sans Serif"
size=2>
del
<BR>
NSRCA - 473</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=divesplat@yahoo.com href="mailto:divesplat@yahoo.com">Ed Deaver</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, May 11, 2004 11:11
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: Rules Proposals Final
Vote</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Having read all the posting on the list on this subject. Several
things are clear to me and this is simply my take on things.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>1) The vote is over. What's done is done and that's it.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>2) Some people are mad some are not(human nature is such that
usually only the upset ones voice an opinion ie lobbyiest success in our
capital)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>3) Their is nothing at this time to be achieved by continuing to
persue th negatives.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>4) We can however learn from this experience. More emphasis
has to be placed on calling our AMA District Reps. A formal survey is
only a document and can be scewed in any which way, same as a phone
poll. We are again at, the membership must contact the District Reps to
give input.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>5) As with most activities or memberships, a very few are
passionate and highly motivated.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>6) Lets do our best to accept these changes, read not agree with or
like, but accept and work towards the next rules cycle where someone may add a
snap into the new Intermediate schedule and if so wished, add a new rules
proposal to add scoring of L/TO.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Just my opinion.</DIV>
<DIV>ed<BR><BR><B><I>Ron Van Putte <vanputte@cox.net></I></B>
wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<DIV>What follows is an exchange of e-mails between Lance Van Nostrand, the
<BR>List, John Fuqua and me. If it comes through as presented, John's
<BR>comments are in blue.<BR><BR>Ron Van Putte<BR><BR>From:
johnfuqua@gdsys.net<BR>Subject: RE: Rules Proposals Final Vote<BR>Date: May
11, 2004 8:50:34 PM CDT<BR>To: vanputte@cox.net<BR><BR>From: Ron Van Putte
</DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face="MS Sans Serif" size=2> **
Klipped 4 reposting..
**</FONT></STRONG></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>