<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1458" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>It appears to me that the AMA always has the last
word on any decision. Sometimes they chose to accept the NSRCA recomendations
and sometimes they do not. Any authority we (NSRCA) have is only because that
authority was delegated to us (NSRCA) and can be undelegated without notice.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The choice to ignore the Rules Survey was (IMHO) at
least rude. However, it is in their domain. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Ten years ago or so, it looked like they (AMA) were
about to abandon our special interest. The NSRCA prepared to support our
interests without the AMA. Since then, there has been a lot of growing on both
sides of the question and AMA has selected an active role in the administration
of our sport. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>There are still a lot of details to work out but
the fact is that we (NSRCA) are subordinate to AMA (also We). </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Where I come from, when the Boss makes a decision
that I don't agree with, I am not relieved of the obligation to try to make it
work. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>John Ferrell <BR><A
href="http://DixieNC.US">http://DixieNC.US</A><BR></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=vanputte@cox.net href="mailto:vanputte@cox.net">Ron Van Putte</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, September 07, 2004 10:43
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Judging Controversy </DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><BR>On Sep 7, 2004, at 8:30 PM, <A
href="mailto:BUDDYonRC@aol.com">BUDDYonRC@aol.com</A> wrote:<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?color><?param 8080,0000,FFFF><?smaller>Pardon
me Ron I must have missed it in your column. If that is the case then why
are we all having this discussion and why is the NSRCA submitting a list to
AMA for judge selection recommendations by them for the 2005 WC If this
has already been determined. Or is this list for the 2007 WC? Sounds like
the latest post's have confused the issue for many of us who are on the
outside looking in, can you please expand on the fact's to explain what
is going on with this issue since I may need to retract statements that I
made in a previous post that were the results of me possibly not
understanding the issue.<?/smaller><?/color><?/fontfamily><BR></BLOCKQUOTE><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?color><?param 8080,0000,FFFF><?smaller></BLOCKQUOTE><?/color><?/fontfamily></BODY></HTML>