<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2523" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Chuck, I have a Widebody 60 with a YS110. About 100
flights.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>It's a loooong build, but an ARC is
offered.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>It's light, (mine is 7 1/2 lb) looks like a pattern
plane, and according to friends who have flown it, "it flys like a pattern
plane".</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The only down side is the cost..it's expensive for
that size plane.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Search 'camodles" or "planesplus"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>croz</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=patternrules@sbcglobal.net
href="mailto:patternrules@sbcglobal.net">Steven maxwell</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, October 18, 2004 9:20
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: Suggestions for Sport
Pattern 40 - 60 size plane</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV> Chuck you are correct that the Swallow is a very good flying plane
as the fuse has been fixed (glass overlay at wing) but the Lark hasn't one of
the guys at the field had one and it flew very well but 3 landings and 3
broken fuses, the biggest disadvantage to these 2 planes and some others is
the cheap covering that is used. </DIV>
<DIV> The Excelleron 90 flys very well also but then haven't seen the 50
so it may or may not be as good as the 90.</DIV>
<DIV> Paul if you like to build the CA Wideboby 40 would good if you
don't the Venus flys great,but if you want something that will fly better go
with the 90 sized planes the difference is huge when you move up in size, in
60-90 size ARF the Excelleron because of the covering only, the Swallow
for the price, if you like to build the CA Epsilon or Widebody 60, all
these would need a 90 or bigger engine almost all ARF's are built heavy
by at least a little, thats why I like to build you know whats there and is
generally lighter, What ever your choice have fun though the winter.</DIV>
<DIV> Steve Maxwell</DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR><B><I>Chuck Hochhalter <cshochhalter@sbcglobal.net></I></B>
wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Hey
Paul! I would suggest the Lark from Giant Scale planes. It is the<BR>little
brother to the Swallow (which I flew this year). Check it out and<BR>very
reasonably priced ARF 160 I think.<BR><BR>Chuck
Hochhalter<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From:
discussion-request@nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org]<BR>On
Behalf Of Paul Horan<BR>Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 8:43 PM<BR>To:
discussion@nsrca.org<BR>Subject: Suggestions for Sport Pattern 40 - 60 size
plane<BR><BR>I am contemplating getting a knock around plane that I can use
for<BR>sport but still practice Intermediate. <BR>Any
ideas.<BR>Thanks,<BR>Paul<BR>=====================================<BR># To
be removed from this list, go
to<BR>http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm<BR>and follow the
instructions.<BR><BR><BR><BR>=====================================<BR># To
be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm<BR>and
follow the instructions.<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>