<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2523" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Bill,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> And as you
know we submitted it again based on the NSRCA members vote of "YES", and again
the contest board threw it out.....</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>If at first......</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=billglaze@triad.rr.com href="mailto:billglaze@triad.rr.com">Bill
Glaze</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, November 17, 2004 9:19
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Support for Masters
Pilots</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Eric:<BR>Your statement below describes exactly the omitted
snap roll on the Intermediate Schedule. Bill Glaze<BR><BR>Eric
Henderson wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=mid000d01c4cb9e$cbd4f8e0$6401a8c0@eric8uxwlyrepn
type="cite"><META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2523" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I must have done this snap maneuver a
whole bunch of times since 2002. At first you are uncomfortable because
you really are in unfamiliar territory. Then it gradually becomes
routine as you perfect your timing. Once mastered you will wonder why
it was such a big deal.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>It was designed so that you entered the loop
inverted going downwind. This results in you heading upwind and upright
just as you perform the snap. This was planned to minimizes
the fear-factor and any panic moments.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>As you get familiar with this maneuver you may
actually find yourself adding power before and during the snap. Yes, I
said adding power.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Adding about 1/4 throttle gives the snap
some exit authority. At first you instinctively do the snap with
down-glide-power only. The result is often a hard-to-stop-accurately snap.
Adding some power seems to give a much better "cone" at the back. I suspect
that this is due to the airflow over the tail feathers continuing though the
maneuver. Try a few going straight and level and vary your speeds and see if
you see what I saw....</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Also just banging full power after the snap
doesn't seem to give as good a climb out as gradually adding power all the
way around the remaining half loop.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Ref. The length of the 1/4-1/2-1/4 roll, it
should be a little bit shorter than a 4-point-roll because it is a 4-point
roll with one point missing.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Ref. The reverse KE, beware of trying to do
super long KE components. It's not a requirement.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Nite,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Eric.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(0,0,0) 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal">-----
Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: rgb(228,228,228) 0% 50%; FONT: 10pt arial; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; moz-background-clip: initial; moz-background-origin: initial; moz-background-inline-policy: initial"><B>From:</B>
<A title=edvwhite@yahoo.com href="mailto:edvwhite@yahoo.com">Ed White</A>
</DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal"><B>To:</B>
<A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal"><B>Sent:</B>
Monday, November 15, 2004 11:35 PM</DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal"><B>Subject:</B>
RE: Warning to Masters Pilots</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>This is very consistent with what I've found.
The<BR>keys for me seem to be speed management and less<BR>aileron in the
snap than I was using last year. <BR><BR>This maneuver is very speed
sensitive. Previous snaps<BR>in the upright Avalanche or 45 deg down
were much less<BR>speed sensitive. I'm flying a Focus II, YS
140L,<BR>17-10N prop and find I actually have to carry a little<BR>- very
little - power above idle into the snap.<BR><BR>Though I have yet to make
it look very pretty.<BR><BR>Ed<BR><BR><BR>--- Archie Stafford <<A
href="mailto:astafford@3states.net">astafford@3states.net</A>>
wrote:<BR><BR>> This really is not that much tougher than any
other<BR>> maneuver. With the breaking available today
with<BR>the<BR>> large fuselages. <BR>> ...<BR>> This is a
maneuver that will require excellent speed<BR>> management, but when
done well is a very pretty<BR>> maneuver. <BR>> <BR>>
Arch<BR>>
<BR><BR><BR>__________________________________________________<BR>Do You
Yahoo!?<BR>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
around <BR><A href="http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</A>
<BR>=================================================<BR>To access the
email archives for this list, go to<BR><A
href="http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/">http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/</A><BR>To
be removed from this list, go to <A
href="http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm">http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm</A><BR>and
follow the
instructions.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>