<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2523" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 bgColor=#ffffff leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7>
<DIV>Matt,</DIV>
<DIV> I have a copy of all the files.
I saw what was done and responded accordingly. <STRONG>My comments are not
new.</STRONG> I guess nobody ever forwarded them to you. BTW - They are
not intended to be an attack on the work done.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I do not challenge the math or the analysis. I noted the shots across my
bow, in other notes, about not understanding the math or the system. A bit
insulting but I'll not fall for that obvious diversionary trap.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Staying on course, I do challenge you to address the following;</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>1. The validity or value of including/using Masters judging performances to
chose an FAI world judge</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>2. Only using this as selection criteria.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>3. The age of the data when rules and judging standards change all of the
time.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>4. Doing this without getting a vote from the membership. It is their
society that is being represented in an FAI issue. I believe that we should have
included them in the decision. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Regards,<BR><BR>Eric.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=Rcmaster199@aol.com
href="mailto:Rcmaster199@aol.com">Rcmaster199@aol.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, December 13, 2004 2:52
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: World Judge selection
process </DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT id=role_document face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>
<DIV>Eric, your notes below surprise me. I am disappointed you feel this way
in regard to the system we came up with. Have you truly analysed the data base
and the program we designed?? </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>MattK</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 12/13/2004 2:41:31 PM Eastern Standard Time, <A
href="mailto:derekkoopowitz@earthlink.net">derekkoopowitz@earthlink.net</A>
writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>From:
<A
href="mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org">discussion-request@nsrca.org</A>
<BR>> [mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org]<BR>> On<BR>> Behalf Of
Grow Pattern<BR>> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 7:31 AM<BR>> To:
discussion@nsrca.org<BR>> Subject: World Judge selection
process<BR>><BR>> Charlie,<BR>>
I had and have absolutely NOTHING to do with this judging
<BR>> evaluation system. You were probably misinformed so please allow me
to <BR>> correct/update the information.<BR>><BR>> FYI - I
nominated Bob Noll to the AMA when Dave Brown asked the NSRCA <BR>> for
its recommendation. It felt like a good choice. I selected him and <BR>>
two others after asking for nominations from the NSRCA District-VP's
<BR>> and the rest of the NSRCA board. He was chosen for his work as a
<BR>> judge, the work done running many judging schools, great services
to <BR>> the NSRCA and especially the AMA after running three USA
Nationals etc.<BR>><BR>> At the time I was overruled by Dave Brown who
chose Mike Dumpy, (for <BR>> similar reasons). Subsequently, Dave chose
Bob after Mike had <BR>> represented the USA on two occasions. (Very well
I might add).<BR>><BR>> The ranking system was put together by RVP and
associates to prove to <BR>> Dave who he should submit to the FAI for WC
judge consideration. I am <BR>> guessing that lobbying took place to
remove Bob Noll and insert the <BR>> top TBL rated USA
judge.<BR>><BR>> I have several issues with the TBL type of judges
ranking.<BR>><BR>> 1. The biggest is that it is too easy for a judge
to do well by <BR>> scoring in<BR><BR>> a<BR>> popular way or an
"average" way. The guy who knows enough about <BR>> judging to give the
correct low score will often be on the "out".<BR>><BR>> 2. Also they
included judging performances from Master's Nat's. There <BR>> is big
difference scoring FAI and Masters. Not least of which is the <BR>> 1/2
point vs.<BR>> the whole point system.<BR>><BR>> 3. They used the
performance in 8 contests (As far as I know). Scoring <BR>> rules and
maneuver standards change. To get eight Nationals/team <BR>> trials you
have to go back a few years. I have always believed that <BR>> only the
last few years of FAI judging should be used because they are <BR>> the
most relevant to performance.<BR>><BR>> 4. It does not take into
account the intangibles such as, <BR>> Statesmanship, ambassadorial
qualities and contribution that will be <BR>> needed in a WC
environment.<BR>><BR>> One further point. I also think that Don Ramsey
is a great guy and <BR>> should not get any flack for being selected. He
was the guy I went to <BR>> and asked to form the current rules/judging
committee. He has helped <BR>> clarify many rules for us and dealt with
many tough issues in a calm <BR>> and professional
manner.<BR>><BR>> I have always been an opponent of the ranking
system. The problem is <BR>> that when you speak out against something
that people are "married" <BR>> to, especially when they are the creators
of the system, you will, and <BR>> I have, draw a lot of abuse. I fully
expect my note to be cropped, <BR>> chopped, torn apart, dissected and
corrected. I might even get another <BR>> "Bull in a china shop" comment
reward. Of course I might just look <BR>> like that to some, especially
when I am in their face and won't back <BR>> down when I see something
going on that I believe is wrong!<BR>><BR>> I credit you for speaking
out Charlie, but I just had to set the <BR>> record straight when you
used my name.<BR>><BR>> Regards,<BR>><BR>> Eric
Henderson.<BR>><BR>><BR>> ----- Original Message -----<BR>>
From: "Rock, Charles" <crock@kclife.com><BR>> To:
<discussion@nsrca.org><BR>> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 9:10
AM<BR>> Subject: RE: [SUSPECT-HEADER] - Re: Adjustable stab weight -
Character <BR>> set not allowed (n/a)<BR>><BR>><BR>>> Well
here is another example of the results of the fox designing the <BR>>>
chicken coop! Don Ramsey knew exactly what he had to do to become the
<BR>>> top ranked judge as did Ron V., Derek K., and Eric H., need I
tell <BR>>> you who all were involved making the judges ranking
system?? THIS <BR>>> PISSES ME OFF...The "Haves" get all the beanies,
and we pay their way <BR>>> too, most likely..Another NSRCA moment!!
Charlie</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></BODY></HTML>