<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2523" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 bgColor=#ffffff leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7>
<DIV>I've tried to stay out of these debates, both with the Judging and with the
<BR>Voting Process.<BR><BR>For Judging, I recall awhile back when someone seem
to have first been <BR>identified to represent the USA that there was some grief
by a few...Now <BR>that selection has been finalized, it again come under
scrutiny. NSRCA is <BR>truly a democratic society filled from the Right to the
Left extreme views.<BR><BR>For the Voting Process...I admire the decision made
by Tony Stillman and I <BR>support his decision. Irregardless of my thoughts
about the $$$ spent being <BR>necessary, the fact remains that it will protect
those that may have counted <BR>them from the cross hairs of the few that type
and fire off e-mails for <BR>effect.<BR><BR>I have met and talked with Maureen
and Mike Dunphy. They have answered many <BR>questions over the years and in my
opinion are very trustworthy people with <BR>high integrity. I would rather
spend the money on having a CPA count the <BR>votes, then to have a bombardment
of e-mails coming out and sending personal <BR>attack about those involved in
counting the votes because someone didn't <BR>like the results, "That would be a
tragedy!!!!!!".<BR><BR>Tony, Thank You for having the backbone to make that
decision and withstand <BR>the scrutiny. A sign of a great leader.<BR><BR>Larry
Diamond<BR>NSRCA 3083<BR>AMA 5024</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=tony@radiosouthrc.com
href="mailto:tony@radiosouthrc.com">tony@radiosouthrc.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, December 16, 2004 9:35
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: NSRCA Voting Process</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Jerry:<BR>The reason that it was done this way was to keep ANY indication
of fraud from happening. On of the candidates works for AMA. Does
it not then follow that AMA should not count the votes? </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>If we are going to do it "right", then let's do it RIGHT! Use a CPA
(just like AMA does for it's own elections) and be done with it....</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Personally, I thought it was a waste of $800, but I apparently was wrong
in thinking this way. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Tony Stillman<BR>Radio South<BR>3702 N. Pace Blvd.<BR>Pensacola, FL
32505<BR>1-800-962-7802<BR><A
href="http://www.radiosouthrc.com">www.radiosouthrc.com</A></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=JAStebbins@worldnet.att.net
href="mailto:JAStebbins@worldnet.att.net">Jerry Stebbins</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, December 15, 2004 7:36
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: NSRCA Voting Process</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>AS, for your information the election has to be held in accordance with
the NSRCA Bylaws. As initially published it was not being structured that
way. So it had to be quickly brought into line with a strict
interpretation of the Bylaws, especially since there were two contested
positions.</DIV>
<DIV> AMA has handled/counted Ballots on previous elections, is
independent from NSRCA, and does not charge for them.Why this path with the
accountant was chosen I do not know, except that Tony announced on this
list on 18 November in two separate messages discussing the NSRCA voting
process, that he was taking care of it that way. It had absolutely nothing
to do with not trusting our current Secretary Maureen, since she was only
responding to what/how she was told to do.</DIV>
<DIV>Hope this clears this up, and people quit putting Maureen, or anyone
else in the line of fire!</DIV>
<DIV>Jerry</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=Xwindflyer@aol.com
href="mailto:Xwindflyer@aol.com">Xwindflyer@aol.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, December 15, 2004
1:44 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: NSRCA Voting
Process</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT id=role_document face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>
<DIV>Why not have the ballots in the KFactor? Every magazine has these
little thingies somewhere in the pages, why not the KF? </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The problem is getting the totals. It seems that you folks just went
through a bunch of expense becauase you didn't trust the secretatyr
to do an accurate count, so that expense will continue in the future.
</DIV>
<DIV>AS</DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></BODY></HTML>