<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body style="font-size: 10pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial;"
bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Sheesh, Bob! You're asking ME? <vbg> bg<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rcaerobob@cox.net">rcaerobob@cox.net</a> wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid20041229191630.ZDAJ1657.lakermmtao10.cox.net@smtp.east.cox.net"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">That means my interpretation of correct presentation of a snap can be that offset is perfectly acceptable. If you're in the chair NEXT to me, judging the same guy, and you hammer him for it, does that mean BOTH of us are correct?
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">From: Bill Glaze <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:billglaze@triad.rr.com"><billglaze@triad.rr.com></a>
Date: 2004/12/29 Wed PM 02:12:03 EST
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</a>
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: Displacement during snap rolls (was Why is it so quiet?)
Matt:
There's always the old subjective, indefinable word: "presentation."
Still usable. Bill Glaze
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Rcmaster199@aol.com">Rcmaster199@aol.com</a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">In a message dated 12/29/2004 1:55:55 PM Eastern Standard Time,
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rcaerobob@cox.net">rcaerobob@cox.net</a> writes:
This is another example of the intent of a thread wandering far
afoot....as the original questioner, I'd like to refocus my point.
Simply put - according to our CURRENT rules, there is NOT a
downgrade criterion for offsetting of the track during a snap
maneuver.
I understand the "more skillful" guy should get a point reward
(by not getting a downgrade that others may receive), but my point
is ----
What is the rule basis for the downgrade?
And since I'm specifically talking about LATERAL track offsets,
not vertical or angular, there aren't "general" guidelines to
handle this.
My point being that there SHOULD NOT be a scored difference
between the line that shifts and the line that doesn't, all other
factors being identical between the quality of the two
snaps.....simply because we don't have the criteria identified.
Or am I just being logical again?
The basis for the downgrade is smoothness and gracefulness, not any
other spelled out criterion. If one looks for a specific, spelled out
rule, it does not exist. Dean threw out half a wing span displacement
in pitch or yaw as acceptable. That's reasonable if not a bit much.
Anything more than that is grounds for downgrade. Not a zero mind you,
just downgrade, and in some cases, severe downgrade that may result in
a zero.
MattK
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Bob Pastorello, El Reno, OK, USA
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rcaerobob@cox.net">rcaerobob@cox.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.rcaerobats.net">www.rcaerobats.net</a>
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/">http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/</a>
To be removed from this list, go to <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm">http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm</a>
and follow the instructions.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>