<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2523" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>
<DIV>The concept has alot of merit in respect to keeping Finals
day more lively in Masters. Either a different schedule or an unknown
thrown in, or both. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>MattK</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 1/6/2005 11:35:32 AM Eastern Standard Time,
pattern4u@comcast.net writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000
size=2><BR>----- Original Message ----- <BR>From: "Grow Pattern"
<pattern4u@comcast.net><BR>To: <flyintexan@houston.rr.com>;
<discussion@nsrca.org><BR>Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 11:25
AM<BR>Subject: AMA MASTER'S unknown?<BR><BR><BR>> How does this list feel
about a Masters Nat's final that was different to <BR>> the regular
schedule. OR, even an unknown in the final to make it more <BR>> than just
three more of the same flown in the heats.<BR>><BR>>
Regards,<BR>><BR>> Eric.<BR>><BR>> >
</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>