<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns:o = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2523" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hmmm - actually the old D-Novice flew FAI schedules
(similar to Masters) and D-Expert flew the same schedules but was the F3A class
of the day. Interestingly, C-Novice and C-Expert were parallel AMA classes - but
were rarely flown due to the touch & go in the schedules. F3A was the
"favorite" schedule back then - same story - different preferences. BTW, the B
class (similar to advanced) got to do the touch & go - lots of fun with
retracts and wood props. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Earl</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=twtaylor@ftc-i.net href="mailto:twtaylor@ftc-i.net">Tim Taylor</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, January 07, 2005 12:38
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: AMA MASTER'S unknown?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Since FAI turn around was started we've geared
our entire sport in the USA to mimic it and it's been driven by FAI ever since
. </FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=d.pappas@kodeos.com href="mailto:d.pappas@kodeos.com">Dean
Pappas</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, January 07, 2005 1:05
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: AMA MASTER'S
unknown?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=562050218-07012005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Thanks Gene,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=562050218-07012005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>As
I mentioned before: we have, as a culture, a tendency to keep making each
skill level harder or more interesting until it breaks, then we fix it and
start over again. Maybe you have to have been in the event for ever to see
it, but I think you have put your finger right on what Masters ought to
be.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=562050218-07012005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=562050218-07012005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Anybody out there remember old D-Novice?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=562050218-07012005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Dean Pappas</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<P><FONT face="Times New Roman">Dean Pappas</FONT> <BR><FONT
face="Times New Roman">Sr. Design Engineer</FONT> <BR><FONT
face="Times New Roman">Kodeos Communications</FONT> <BR><FONT
face="Times New Roman">111 Corporate Blvd.</FONT> <BR><FONT
face="Times New Roman">South Plainfield, N.J. 07080</FONT> <BR><FONT
face="Times New Roman">(908) 222-7817 phone</FONT> <BR><FONT
face="Times New Roman">(908) 222-2392 fax</FONT> <BR><FONT
face="Times New Roman">d.pappas@kodeos.com</FONT> </P>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
discussion-request@nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org]<B>On
Behalf Of </B>gene.maurice@comcast.net<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, January 07,
2005 12:49 PM<BR><B>To:</B> discussion@nsrca.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re:
AMA MASTER'S unknown?<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">To Whom It May
Concern:<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">I am a Masters flier and I
DON'T want to fly FAI or FAI like sequences. For me personally, Masters is
a destination. If I wanted to fly finals and unknowns, then I would fly
FAI. I fly Masters and will stay in Masters because I don't want to, nor
can I for that matter, effectively fly the FAI sequences. If people want
more challenge than Masters affords, I would respectfully suggest that
they consider flying FAI. Again, for me personally, the difficulty of
the current and prior Masters sequences are all that I can
handle, and even then I'm a perennial bottom feeder. Why in the world
do we need two classes that are for all intents and purposes
equal? <o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"> <o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">I believe there is a fair
contingent of fliers who are like me: good enough to fly their
current class without embarrassing themselves, not good enough to ever
win, their lives only allow a minimal amount of practice, but continue to
do this because IT’S SUPPOSED TO BE FUN!!!!. Why must we continually
tinker with Masters. Don’t get me wrong, I like the periodic change in the
schedules. I don’t even mind the ever increasing difficulty, even though
it has made me even LESS competitive. Again, I submit, if you are not
sufficiently challenged by Masters, FLY FAI!!! <o:p></o:p></P> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV class=signature id=signature>--<BR>Gene Maurice
<BR>gene.maurice@comcast.net <BR>Plano, TX</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">--------------
Original message -------------- <BR>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2523" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Bob:<BR><BR>I am not taking any sides here
either, as I don't fly Masters. However, If Masters is to be an
ending class paralleling FAI, then perhaps either a finals sequence, or
a finals and unknown are appropriate. This puts it on the same
level as FAI which is what many have told me they thought Masters should
be. This will give the same level of difficulty as FAI, but with
all the associated rules and sequences totally controlled by the
USA. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Having been USA Team Manager 4 times, I
totally agree that the caller becomes an integral part of a successful
pilot, especially in the unknowns. Having a known finals sequence
is less demanding on the caller, but requires the Masters pilot to learn
a second, much more difficult sequence. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Keep in mind that this would only effect
the NATS. I would push for a rule that makes flying the finals
sequence at a local contest illegal! This is the way it is in FAI
as well. Finals and unknowns are only flown at National and
International competitions. This keeps everyone who has no
interest in flying at a Nationals from having to learn anything other
than the Masters pattern. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>A poll would be interesting, but I would
only allow those that have flown at the last couple of NATS to be
involved, pushing the rule that any extra sequences would only be flown
at the NATS finals. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Anyway, my $0.02...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>Tony Stillman<BR>Radio South<BR>3702 N. Pace Blvd.<BR>Pensacola, FL
32505<BR>1-800-962-7802<BR><A
href="http://www.radiosouthrc.com/">www.radiosouthrc.com</A></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=rcaerobob@cox.net href="mailto:rcaerobob@cox.net">Bob
Pastorello</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, January 06, 2005
5:39 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: AMA MASTER'S
unknown?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I guess since I never take a position on
anything, I should probably do so on this -- so -- here
'tis.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>1. This is a genuine yes/no POLL
question of the MASTERS pilots only....and needs to be carefully
administered, IF the Board is interested in opening this
one.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>2. If the POLL has at least 2/3
majority, then the next question should be designed to find out
how crazy we (Masters) pilots are about having our scores judged by
JUDGES WHO HAVE NEVER SEEN THE SEQUENCE and </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>3. How crazy we are about the
totally-impossible-to-fairly-administer influence of the "team".
At this level of competitions (you guys are talking about the NATS
FINALS, for G---s sake!!!) I would be hard pressed to say it will be
"fair" to have the outcome determined by who had the best caller
(or the most effective team). Not everyone can do that...
and finally ....</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>4. MASTERS is supposed to be the
Top AMA class....as such, philosophically, I think it should be the
best - the VERY best - of precision, smoothness, and
gracefulness....</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>AND implementing an Unknown turns all
that back into "IMPRESSION" judging....</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I'm not in favor of it; won't be;
won't try to persuade others to be; and believe wholeheartedly that if
a pilot is strongly committed to flying Unknowns that he go play
IMAC. Then fly "Pattern" for precision, practiced, smooth and
skillfully-executed "routines".</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR>Bob Pastorello<BR>NSRCA 199 AMA 46373<BR><A
href="mailto:rcaerobob@cox.net">rcaerobob@cox.net</A><BR><A
href="http://www.rcaerobats.net/">www.rcaerobats.net</A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=divesplat@yahoo.com href="mailto:divesplat@yahoo.com">Ed
Deaver</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, January 06,
2005 3:54 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: AMA MASTER'S
unknown?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Flying an Unknown truely does make it a 2 person flight.
I would still welcome the opportunity as the challange and
thrill(flying well or goofing up and trying to collect yourself to
fly the next manuever) is really great. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I don't know if it really identifies the callers ability, as
much as the teams ability. Another thought depends on how much
time is allowed to prepare also.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>ed<BR><BR><B><I>rcaerobob@cox.net</I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Before
I'd answer whether I wanted one or not, I'd like to have an
understanding of what, specifically, the unknown in Masters would
"reveal". If pattern is about precision piloting that could be a
different thing than an ability to have a good
caller....<BR><BR>Just my ignorant opinion.<BR><BR>Bob P.<BR>>
<BR>> From: "Grow Pattern" <PATTERN4U@COMCAST.NET><BR>>
Date: 2005/01/06 Thu AM 11:25:48 EST<BR>> To:
<FLYINTEXAN@HOUSTON.RR.COM>, <BR>>
<DISCUSSION@NSRCA.ORG><BR>> Subject: AMA MASTER'S
unknown?<BR>> <BR>> How does this list feel about a Masters
Nat's final that was different to <BR>> the regular schedule.
OR, even an unknown in the final to make it more than <BR>>
just three more of the same flown in the heats.<BR>> <BR>>
Regards,<BR>> <BR>>
Eric.</BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>