<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2523" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 bgColor=#ffffff leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7>
<DIV><FONT size=4>So far I have practiced about seventy of them. No damage at
all. I go in slow, snap and power through the second half of the loop. I
don't think it's as hard on the plane as the snap on the forty-five down
line.<BR><BR>Ed</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=rcaerobob@cox.net href="mailto:rcaerobob@cox.net">Bob Pastorello</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, January 07, 2005 8:17
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: 2005 Masters maneuver #4 -
Warning</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Oh - wait - could it be that PROPERLY built wings will withstand
it?</DIV>
<DIV>Nahhh.... :-)</DIV>
<DIV><BR>Bob Pastorello<BR>NSRCA 199 AMA 46373<BR><A
href="mailto:rcaerobob@cox.net">rcaerobob@cox.net</A><BR><A
href="http://www.rcaerobats.net">www.rcaerobats.net</A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=Rcmaster199@aol.com
href="mailto:Rcmaster199@aol.com">Rcmaster199@aol.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, January 07, 2005 7:05
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: 2005 Masters maneuver #4 -
Warning</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT id=role_document face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>
<DIV>Maybe I am thick and don't get it. WHAT IS IT with this
maneuver??</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>This is about as easy as the top snapping one to do right. My
Temptress tube is aluminum and Im not bending tubes. What gives?? I did 15
or 16 of these back to back to back to see what the hubbub's about and
didn't see an issue. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Are you talking 100's here or what?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>MattK</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 1/7/2005 7:41:21 PM Eastern Standard Time,
pattern4u@comcast.net writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><EM>This is a sort of public service
announcement, or at least please regard it as a
"Heads-up".</EM></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>For all of you who are flying or will be
flying the Reverse Avalanche you might want to check your wing tubes and
phenolic tube wing supports.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>It seems that if you go into the snap a bit
hard you can bend your wing tube or, in the worst case scenario break,
your wing. The plane is pulling some G's at the bottom of the
loop and then you add more by putting in a lot of elevator to
get a good break for the snap.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Last year I had several incidents reported to
me and my initial reaction was to say that they were probably not flying
the maneuver correctly. <EM>"You need to slow the plane down at the bottom
of the loop",</EM> I said. I must add that what I said did not
impress an FAI and pilot and District masters champion very much.
:-(</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>So strapping on my asbestos underwear I
decided to do some testing of my own. </FONT><FONT face=Arial
size=2>At the end of November 2004 it was nice here in NJ. I
took the Focus-2 and the Temptation out for a day of Masters 2005. Both
planes were inspected for tube tightness and the wing covering touched up
with the glove-iron.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Twelve flights later and an average of 10
reverse avalanches in each flight I went home thinking all was well. (It
got cold and a bit dark too).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Back in the shop the first thing that I
noticed was new wrinkles in the covering on the Temptation wings.
Nothing was loose. To test this I put the wing-tube in the wing and leaned
on it a little. All was well but I was beginning to think that the wing
must have flexed to cause the covering to loosen up. A bit like what
the covering sometimes does around the aileron horns. It this case it was
at the roots above the tubes - both sides.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Then I turned to the Focus-2 wings. Not good!
The wing-tube could now be moved up and down and I could hear foamy
crunches in both of the wings. </FONT><FONT face=Arial size=2>Both wings
have Carbon tube wing tubes and it dawned on me that they could not bend
(much) or stay bent. That is why I had not seen this before. The
forces were applying themselves to the ends of the wing tubes. I opened up
both panels and added epoxy and micro balloons to stabilize the sub ribs.
It was an easy repair but could have been a lot worse if I was not looking
for it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I am advised that stress damage is
cumulative and that it does not show up initially. It certainly had
not revealed itself while I had been demonstrating the 2005 schedule
over the late summer of 2004. So where does this leave me? I think
we have a potential problem that requires frequent preventative equipment
inspection depending upon the planes that you fly. If you can slow down
your plane and it is at around 10 lb you may never see this
happening.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><STRONG><U>I would strongly advise checking
your wing with the wing tube in place to look for tube movement. Also look
for straightness if you have an ali-wing-tube.</U></STRONG></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>This situation is a bit unique for me. It is
the first time I have been involved with a maneuver that you don't
know you are doing it wrong unless you fly it that way too many
times. And then only if the wing shows damage or even worse it breaks
in the air.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Regards,</FONT></DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
<DIV><BR>Eric Henderson.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>P.S. The only time I remember seeing a reverse avalanche before
is in the hardly flown? current FAI Finals
schedule.</DIV></FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></BODY></HTML>