<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2523" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>PAC now has all the new Bolly gear in stock.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Maureen</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=jerry@buddengineering.com
href="mailto:jerry@buddengineering.com">Jerry Budd</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, January 31, 2005 11:31
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Which Bolly undercarriage is
suitable for the Majestic ?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Matt - Pics?<BR><BR>Thx, Jerry<BR><BR>>To all those
interested in gear for electric pattern models, let me <BR>>also put in a
shameless plug for our Custom Gear. We have just <BR>>started to ship our
Custom Gear for Electrics. Gear height from <BR>>axles to base is 10" and
depending on your fuse width, have a span <BR>>of approximately 20"
minimum. This is enough height to accomodate up <BR>>to 24" prop (with
adequate clearance), for most model set-ups. The <BR>>gear is coming in at
approximately 6.2 ozs (175 grams), completely <BR>>ready to fly. Less if I
can find lighter wheels.<BR>><BR>>Contact me off list please, if
interested<BR>><BR>>MattK<BR>>MDK Enigineering<BR>><BR>>In a
message dated 1/30/2005 8:14:59 PM Eastern Standard Time,
<BR>>falconhob@telus.net writes:<BR>><BR>>Hi
Hitesh,<BR>><BR>>The look of the 2 gear is identical; I believe you're
going to split <BR>>them to fit the fuse, in which case you can go with the
F3A large. <BR>>Next month we will have the F3A curved gear in stock, which
<BR>>dimensionally are similar to the F3A large, but are a curved
<BR>>rearward sweep vs. the more angular look of the F3A. A slightly
<BR>>taller and much taller version for electrics will be available
<BR>>shortly as well.<BR>><BR>>Hope this helps,<BR>><BR>>Wayne
Powell<BR>>Bolly Props North
America<BR>>www.bollyprops.com<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>>From:
<A href="mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org">discussion-request@nsrca.org</A>
<BR>>[mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Hitesh
Gajjar<BR>>Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 2:40 PM<BR>>To: <A
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A><BR>>Subject:
Which Bolly undercarriage is suitable for the Majestic
?<BR>><BR>> Hi,<BR>><BR>>I''m about to
order the carbon fibre landing gear for my Majestic <BR>>but I''m not sure
about whether to get the F3A Large or the F3A wide <BR>>? I''m concerned
about looks here. Any thoughts
?<BR>><BR>>Thanks<BR>>Hitesh<BR>><BR>><BR><BR><BR>--
<BR>___________<BR>Jerry Budd<BR>Budd Engineering<BR>(661) 722-5669
Voice/Fax<BR>(661) 435-0358 Cell Phone<BR><A
href="mailto:jerry@buddengineering.com">mailto:jerry@buddengineering.com</A><BR><A
href="http://www.buddengineering.com">http://www.buddengineering.com</A><BR>=================================================<BR>To
access the email archives for this list, go to<BR><A
href="http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/">http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/</A><BR>To
be removed from this list, go to <A
href="http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm">http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm</A><BR>and
follow the instructions.<BR><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>