<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2523" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face=Arial size=2>But a valid point Ron. One we will
not see changed in my lifetime.</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face=Arial size=2> </FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face=Arial size=2>
del</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=vanputte@cox.net href="mailto:vanputte@cox.net">Ron Van Putte</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, February 07, 2005 2:31
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: OFF topic subject worthy of
viewing</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><BR>On Feb 7, 2005, at 1:19 PM, Ed Miller wrote:<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?smaller>We need a world where those
setting policy are the ones responsible to carry it out
too..........I wonder if we'd ever have wars
then.<?/smaller><?/fontfamily><BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>That point has been made
many times with no result. A question I'd like to hear an answer to is, "If
Social Security is so great and doesn't need to be fixed, why aren't
Congresspersons and Senators covered by it, rather than their own system?"
Sorry, but that was WAY off topic.<BR><BR>Ron Van Putte<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>----- Original Message
-----<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger><?/x-tad-bigger><B><?x-tad-bigger>From:<?/x-tad-bigger></B><?x-tad-bigger>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?color><?param 0000,0000,EEEE><?x-tad-bigger>Rick Wallace<?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?x-tad-bigger> <?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><BR><B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>To:<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?color><?param 0000,0000,EEEE><?x-tad-bigger>discussion@nsrca.org<?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?x-tad-bigger>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><BR><B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>Sent:<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>
Monday, February 07, 2005 1:47 PM<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><BR><B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>Subject:<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>
Re: OFF topic subject worthy of
viewing<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><BR><BR><BR>I'm reading into Nat's
comment that he believes the mission might not be a 'right/good' one, but
given that our guys are there, they deserve our total support - since
they're the guys who're carrying out the policy, not the ones setting
it...<BR><BR>That's certianly how I feel about the issue of our guys in
Iraq/ Afgahnistan/ etc- too many friends / comrades/ classmates over there
to feel otherwise.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>