<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1491" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 bgColor=#ffffff leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7>
<DIV><SPAN class=904034415-14022005>So right, Ed.</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=904034415-14022005>The 6-40 is what comes with all the old
Rocket City (now Nelson Hobby) stuff. The root diameter is noticeably
bigger.</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=904034415-14022005></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<P><FONT face="Times New Roman">Dean Pappas</FONT> <BR><FONT
face="Times New Roman">Sr. Design Engineer</FONT> <BR><FONT
face="Times New Roman">Kodeos Communications</FONT> <BR><FONT
face="Times New Roman">111 Corporate Blvd.</FONT> <BR><FONT
face="Times New Roman">South Plainfield, N.J. 07080</FONT> <BR><FONT
face="Times New Roman">(908) 222-7817 phone</FONT> <BR><FONT
face="Times New Roman">(908) 222-2392 fax</FONT> <BR><FONT
face="Times New Roman">d.pappas@kodeos.com</FONT> </P>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
discussion-request@nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org]<B>On Behalf
Of </B>Ed Miller<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, February 14, 2005 10:40
AM<BR><B>To:</B> discussion@nsrca.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: 4-40 or 6-32
control arms?<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV>If you can find them, 6-40 are better, finer thread. I've been using
Dubro metric socket head bolts ( can't remember size ) with the heads cut off,
again finer thread than the 6/32.</DIV>
<DIV>Ed M.</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=Rcmaster199@aol.com
href="mailto:Rcmaster199@aol.com">Rcmaster199@aol.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, February 14, 2005 10:09
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: 4-40 or 6-32 control
arms?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT id=role_document face=Arial color=#000000>
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 2/14/2005 12:22:29 AM Eastern Standard Time, <A
href="mailto:ed_alt@hotmail.com">ed_alt@hotmail.com</A> writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000>
<DIV>I've been using 6-32 bolts to make the control horn arms for my 2M
setups so far. It seems like that might be overkill and that 4-40
would suffice. Is it OK to go lighter like this?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks</DIV>
<DIV>Ed A.</DIV></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Ed I wouldn't do that especially on ailerons. I have had 4-40's snap
off like twigs on 90 sized models before. The vibration kills them.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Matt</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></BODY></HTML>