<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1491" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=692543215-16022005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>I run
5% Powermaster in my Moki 1.80. It is cheap and is a Castor/Syn blend
(mostly synthetic). I did run FAI Powermaster in it when it was new for
the breakin, it ran about the same as it does on the 5%, but the FAI was all
Castor lube----Yuck...</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> discussion-request@nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request@nsrca.org]<B>On Behalf Of </B>Ron Van
Putte<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, February 16, 2005 9:14 AM<BR><B>To:</B>
discussion@nsrca.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: Moki
180<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><BR>On Feb 16, 2005, at 8:53 AM, Rcmaster199@aol.com
wrote:<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?smaller>To be honest, if weight
wasn't an issue, I would use the MOKI 180. I have not used an engine more
user friendly or more robust than that one, and has power to burn. Piped,
propped and mounted correctly, it could be made fairly quiet. It
was nice to just fuel it, prime it, one flip start it, and have it last
several seasons without any hint of a problem. No bearings, no rods, no
rings, or anything else for that
matter.<BR><?/smaller><?/fontfamily></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>I have virtually no
experience with MOKI engines, other than to sell fuel to owners and listen to
complaints from the ones who aren't convinced that MOKIs want/need low % nitro
fuel to operate properly. Does anyone care to comment which fuel works best in
their MOKI?<BR><BR>Ron Van Putte <BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>