<DIV>Has YS experimented with twins? I had not heard that (but then I have not paid much attention for a while).</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I've always thought a 1.80 or 2.20 twin using existing parts from the .91 or 1.10 engines would be awesome. Should be much smoother than a single banger.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Bob R.</DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR><B><I>Grow Pattern <pattern4u@comcast.net></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2604" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I had a Midwest with a Moki 1.8 but wasn't enough power, so I add another 1.8.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The MOKI 3.6 Twin was awesome.....if a little heavy. Vertical was pure. Roll rate was maintained until out-a-sight going up...I remember having a hard time starting the twin. I recall building monster starters, 24 volts and all that stuff. Then one day I forgot my 2nd ni-starter and tried to start it on one cylinder. Dead easy!, Then I just lit the second cylinder with the one ni-starter.... The pistons were fighting each other as the fired alternately.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Still needed the tank right up against the wall</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I'd love YS to bring out a 280 opposed twin, like their earlier experiments..still dreaming of sunny weather as well..</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>In NJ and cold... Eric.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>