<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2604" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=4>BTW, I can make those a lot prettier than the
Mickey-lanche!<BR><BR>Ed</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=vanputte@cox.net href="mailto:vanputte@cox.net">Ron Van Putte</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, February 18, 2005 10:01
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Reverse Avalanche</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><BR>On Feb 18, 2005, at 8:39 PM, Ed Hartley wrote:<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><?bigger>I think it junky looking. I would have liked tow loops
with half rolls at the bottom!<?/bigger><BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>Tow loop? Isn't
that a move the figure skaters do? <BG><BR><BR>Seriously, loops with two
integrated half rolls at the bottom would drive me right out of the Master
class. I look at the maneuvers we routinely do and shake my head, because the
best pilots in the world were having problems with them a few years
ago.<BR><BR>Ron Van Putte<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>----- Original Message
-----<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger><?/x-tad-bigger><B><?x-tad-bigger>From:<?/x-tad-bigger></B><?x-tad-bigger>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?color><?param 0000,0000,EEEE><?x-tad-bigger>Derek
Koopowitz<?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?x-tad-bigger> <?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><BR><B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>To:<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?color><?param 0000,0000,EEEE><?x-tad-bigger>NSRCA List<?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?x-tad-bigger>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><BR><B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>Sent:<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>
Friday, February 18, 2005 9:35 PM<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><BR><B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>Subject:<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>
Reverse Avalanche<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><BR><BR><BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?smaller>Ok,
so now that we've had our 1st pattern contest in 2005 with the new Masters
schedule… how many problems were encountered on the RA? Specifically -
how many planes had bent wing tubes after the contest? :)<?/smaller><?/fontfamily><BR><BR><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?smaller>Seriously…
so what is the consensus now on this maneuver?<?/smaller><?/fontfamily>
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>