<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns:o = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #8000ff; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
face=Arial color=#8000ff size=2>
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 2/24/2005 7:25:59 PM Central Standard Time,
patterndude@comcast.net writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000>Buddy,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000>One good idea that I didn't see in your list was the
onelwhere the weight limit for the Advanced-thru-FAI classes remains the same
but the limit for Sportsmand/Intermediate is raised. This really makes
sense to me. We are all comfortable with advancing difficulty in
sequences. Well, building light is also a learned skill and sometimes
requires more $$ comittment. Pilots grow in flying, building, trimming
skills. Why subject sportsman to FAI building rules?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000>--Lance</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=mailto:BUDDYonRC@aol.com
href="mailto:BUDDYonRC@aol.com">BUDDYonRC@aol.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=mailto:discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, February 24, 2005 1:33
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Weight rules discussion ( my
opinion)</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#8000ff size=2>
<DIV>Since the whole message was to large to post following is my
opinion.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face="Times New Roman"
color=#000000 size=3>After a thorough weighted comparison of the items
listed in my previous post I have arrived at the following
conclusions.</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT size=3><FONT
color=#000000><FONT face="Times New Roman"><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It is most important that we strive
to make pattern an inclusive sport, which I feel is necessary to increase
participation in the future. In order to do that one of the first item that
should be addressed is that of eliminating the illegitimate double standard
in the weight rule. There are two possible solutions; the first would be to
enforce all rules, which many agree in this case would not be in patterns
best interest. That leaves us with only one solution and that is to change
the rule.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT size=3><FONT
color=#000000><FONT face="Times New Roman"><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>In doing that we must consider the
overall impact of such a change to insure that it serves to protect all the
other aspects concerned as much as possible. After careful review and
acknowledging that maintaining the two-meter rule is in fact the limiting
design criteria for pattern I suggest that a change in the rule upward to
twelve pounds or in light of current FAI considerations, to 5.5K would be an
appropriate solution.</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face="Times New Roman"
color=#000000 size=3>This change could possibly effect other aspects of
pattern design in the future but given the known requirements some of which
are listed in my previous post that are necessary and practiced extensively
today I have little fear that this change will result in any major design
changes that would present a problem or afford anyone an unfair advantage in
the near future.</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT size=3><FONT
color=#000000><FONT face="Times New Roman"><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>If you study the items in my previous
post it will also become apparent that there are many listed that offer
the potential to increase our participation and make pattern more inclusive.
</FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face="Times New Roman"
color=#000000 size=3>Should anyone have any other items to offer that I
should include which may require further evaluation concerning my
conclusions and suggested weight change please forward them to
me.</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT face="Times New Roman"
color=#000000 size=3>Buddy Brammer</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT size=3><FONT
color=#000000><FONT
face="Times New Roman"> <o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><FONT size=3><FONT
color=#000000><FONT
face="Times New Roman"></FONT></FONT></FONT> </P></DIV></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Lance</DIV>
<DIV>In my evaluation the rules need to apply to Pattern as a whole. With the
two meter size limit builders will utilize the rules of aerodynamics to achieve
the optimum design and weight becomes a moot issue for all classes.</DIV>
<DIV>Buddy </DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>