<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2604" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #8000ff; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 bgColor=#ffffff leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000>One must remember history to help here. Has any past
changes ever brought the cost of pattern down? I believe it has always made it
more expensive such as what happened with engine displacement.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000> I am envisioning a
new pattern plane for the new weight.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000>It will be a monoplane, 78" ws, 78" length, fuse height
18", fuse width 10", wing root 25", wing tip15", 15degree sweep at the quarter
chord, 12% airfoil making the wing root 3" thick, stab 28" and nearly 2" thick.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000> I hope it doesnt
look exagerated, but I would be afraid this would be the trend. Obviously I dont
know to what extent the poor flying quality of this kind of design would be, but
who knows what could happen. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000> Classic case of
opening one door into a room full of doors. </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>