<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #8000ff; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
face=Arial color=#8000ff size=2>
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 2/25/2005 6:39:27 PM Central Standard Time,
wgalligan@goodsonacura.com writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000>I think he was being facetious Buddy.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000>WG</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=mailto:BUDDYonRC@aol.com
href="mailto:BUDDYonRC@aol.com">BUDDYonRC@aol.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=mailto:discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, February 25, 2005 6:29
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Weight limit
discussion</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#8000ff size=2>
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 2/25/2005 6:13:19 PM Central Standard Time, <A
title=mailto:tbrox@cox.net href="mailto:tbrox@cox.net">tbrox@cox.net</A>
writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000>One must remember history to help here. Has any
past changes ever brought the cost of pattern down? I believe it has
always made it more expensive such as what happened with engine
displacement.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000> I am
envisioning a new pattern plane for the new weight.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000>It will be a monoplane, 78" ws, 78" length, fuse
height 18", fuse width 10", wing root 25", wing tip15", 15degree sweep at
the quarter chord, 12% airfoil making the wing root 3" thick, stab 28" and
nearly 2" thick. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000> I hope it
doesnt look exagerated, but I would be afraid this would be the trend.
Obviously I dont know to what extent the poor flying quality of this kind
of design would be, but who knows what could happen. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#000000> Classic case
of opening one door into a room full of doors.
</FONT></DIV></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Terry</DIV>
<DIV>You know more about pattern design than that. The engine required to
pull that monster will surely weigh in at four pounds add gear, radio
exhaust system for another four pounds and covering or paint of a half pound
that means the airframe will have to be three and a half pounds. you better
start looking for weightless balsa. Be sure to install giant control
surfaces so you will be able to use it as a fun fly and all your effort wont
be wasted</DIV>
<DIV>Buddy </DIV></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>I know he was</DIV>
<DIV>Buddy</DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>