<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2604" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 bgColor=#ffffff leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7>
<DIV>What happens if only 2 contestants show up ?? Just received my KFactor and
see we are at only 531 members worldwide. </DIV>
<DIV>Ed M.</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=johnferrell@earthlink.net
href="mailto:johnferrell@earthlink.net">John Ferrell</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, March 03, 2005 1:30
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Pattern Box Rules
(discussion)</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>The thing that needs fixin' is attendance in the lower classes. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I have already been working on how we are going to judge when nobody
shows up but the Masters Class. Would it be OK to have two of them sit out
each round and judge?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>John Ferrell <BR><A
href="http://DixieNC.US">http://DixieNC.US</A><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=Rcmaster199@aol.com
href="mailto:Rcmaster199@aol.com">Rcmaster199@aol.com</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, March 02, 2005 10:42
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Pattern Box Rules
(discussion)</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><FONT id=role_document face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>In Pattern:</DIV>
<DIV>There's nothing wrong with the +/-60 degree stage rule and the 150
meter out distance is fine also. </DIV>
<DIV>There's nothing wrong with the 5 kilo max rule. </DIV>
<DIV>There is nothing wrong with the 2x2 meter max rule</DIV>
<DIV>There's nothing wrong with the unlimited engine power rule</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>What's the next complaint du jur that ""needs fixing"""? The 42 volt
nominal voltage when an electric is involved? Or possibly argue that real
radio programmability with rate functions is desirable? Or autopilots and
gyros? Or maybe putting an upper limit on prop size because a X" prop on an
engine is dangerous? </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Interestingly, one could argue that pattern has some similarity to golf
in that it's an individual's sport. Many may play golf
but a small percentage is good at it and extremely few are
pros. C'mon fellas, pattern should be challenging to do well. Actually, more
accurately, pattern is just plain tough to do, period. I find that fun.
Don't you?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>MattK</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></BODY></HTML>