<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1498" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>
<DIV>Lance, I just got Aerofly Pro myself and have been using an older Futabe
7UAP with no RF module in it for the TX. Battery lasts forever without an
RF load on it. Works great and I am not wearing out my 'good'
TX. I am impressed by the 'feel' of Aerofly Pro compared to the older
Realflight G2. Have also tried the Realflight G3 and my vote goes for
AFP. The included Smaradg feels real good, actually snaps and spins and
the out of the box setup is pretty close. I increased the down elev throw
a little and also bumped the rudder a little and that is all. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Don</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 5/11/2005 5:31:27 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
patterndude@comcast.net writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px"><FONT
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>So I think I've seen that most everyone thinks
the Ikarus AeroFly Pro simulator is good for pattern. I'm thinking of
getting a sim but I'm nervous about using my transmitter with the antenna
down. Don't want to overload the RF and I don't want to sit at my
computer with a 3 foot antenna banging off my office furniture. Oh, and
I don't want to buy a new transmitter that lets me turn off the RF. What
are you all doing for a transmitter?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>--Lance</FONT></DIV></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>