<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Let me know if I can help. Be glad to do
it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thanks, Don.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR>Bob Pastorello<BR><A
href="http://www.rcaerobats.net">www.rcaerobats.net</A><BR><A
href="mailto:rcaerobob@cox.net">rcaerobob@cox.net</A></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=don.ramsey@cox.net href="mailto:don.ramsey@cox.net">Don Ramsey</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, June 06, 2005 6:32 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Track v.s. Heading</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Bob,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>This should be cleared up the regulations. Let's try
to do it in the upcoming cycle.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Don</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=rcaerobob@cox.net href="mailto:rcaerobob@cox.net">Bob
Pastorello</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, June 06, 2005 6:09
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Track v.s. Heading</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Good explanation, and is clearly the way we all
HAVE been judging it through the years.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>My original concern was correction of the Rule
book terminology.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Does that need just some RCP to the AMA ?
Or via the Survey? Or individual, or what?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The misuse of those terms is pretty gross for
the newbie who has only the rule book to try and figure out this
deal.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR>Bob Pastorello<BR><A
href="http://www.rcaerobats.net">www.rcaerobats.net</A><BR><A
href="mailto:rcaerobob@cox.net">rcaerobob@cox.net</A></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=don.ramsey@cox.net href="mailto:don.ramsey@cox.net">Don
Ramsey</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">Discussion NSRCA</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, June 06, 2005 5:52
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Track v.s. Heading</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>OK, here's my thoughts on heading and track. They
are very different terms. Track is the path of the model over the
ground. Heading is the direction the nose is pointed. With no
wind, heading and track are the same. The downgrades for some
turnaround maneuvers are absolutely incorrect when there is the statement,
"Model heading does not finish exactly opposite direction of entry."
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Let's take an example:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Say the course parallel to the flight line is
north-south (360 or 180 degrees). Assume the 180 degree heading
is from left to right. With no wind, if the model is flying parallel
to the flight line the heading and track will be 180 degrees from left to
right. Now assume an in blowing wind that requires a 15 degree correction
to maintain a path parallel to the flightline. Remember the track of
the model must be wind corrected to track parallel to the judges.
The heading is now 165 degrees but the track is 180 degrees. The
model is crabbed into the wind 15 degrees with the wings level as required
by our regs and the nose is pointed away from the pilot. Now assume
you do a half loop as a turnaround. The opposite heading to 165
degrees is 345 degrees. And that heading points the model into the
flightline not away as would be required for wind correction. How
many judges would award a perfect score if the model was pointed into the
flightline when an opposite correction was required? These
mis-stated downgrades in the regulations have been ignored for years (at
least I hope they have). Substitute track for heading and the model
is now required to exit the half loop on an exact opposite track. In
other words, parallel to the flightline entering the maneuver and parallel
to the flightline on exit.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Don</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>PS: On all modern jetliners the NAV display has pointers
for both heading and track and they are seldom the same in the
air.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT
size=2></FONT> </DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>