<DIV>Ooops, let me correct that - should read: "Neither option appears to have inverted entry segments"</DIV>
<DIV>Cheers</DIV>
<DIV>Rodney<BR><BR><B><I>Rodney Tanner <rodney19821982@yahoo.com></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<DIV>Re: Advanced sequencies A and B - Sorry if I am jumping the gun, feedbackwise. First impression is that both are a step down from the current schedule. Niether has option appears to have inverted entry segments? I am looking forward to flying them however :-)</DIV>
<DIV>Rodney Tanner - Advanced pilot.</DIV>
<DIV>NSRCA # 2906<BR><BR><B><I>Lamar Blair <l.blair@worldnet.att.net></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">The Sequences are now available to download thanks to all the committee <BR>members for the hard work.<BR>www.nsrca.org<BR><BR>Lamar Blair<BR>NSRCA President<BR>256-353-8154<BR>l.blair@worldnet.att.net<BR><BR><BR>----- Original Message ----- <BR>From: "Troy A. Newman" <TROY_NEWMAN@MSN.COM><BR>To: <DISCUSSION@NSRCA.ORG><BR>Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:55 PM<BR>Subject: [SPAM] Re: Flying the new sequences<BR><BR><BR>> Terry and list members,<BR>><BR>> You have not found them because they were not for publication. Rather they<BR>> were in a "drafted form" waiting for approval.<BR>> A couple of people could not hold their tea for a few days until the <BR>> product<BR>> was ready for release. The result is there are some that know and some <BR>> that<BR>> don't. That is now changed. Anyone that wants them can get them from the<BR>> NSRCA site. They should be
up in a day or two.<BR>><BR>> The plan was to have a meeting of the minds in the NSRCA Board and then <BR>> the<BR>> product would be released to the membership. Since the Cat is out of the<BR>> bag, and nothing was intended to be a secret in the first place....The<BR>> sequences will be posted on the NSRCA website in the next day or so. These<BR>> have been flown by lots of pilots of different skill levels all over the<BR>> country. Anyone that wants copies can have them and distribute as they see<BR>> fit. These are only proposals. They are not set in stone and are not<BR>> approved for the 2007 contest seasons. They are subject to change.<BR>><BR>> As of now all I have consistently is email. My computer is toast. This is<BR>> suppose to change on Friday with a new computer. I can answer questions in<BR>> the mean time. Please be patient. There was a plan of action. That plan of<BR>> action was the June 15th KF deadline. Everything is
do to the editor on <BR>> that<BR>> day. The gun got jumped by a couple weeks with some anxious people that<BR>> could not wait until that day. The reason for the June 15th deadline being<BR>> after the product was submitted to the board was to fix errors and <BR>> problems<BR>> with the product. I think we have things in pretty good shape. Not to say <BR>> a<BR>> change may not happen...just that they are solid in the current form. <BR>> Errors<BR>> can and do slip through the cracks.<BR>><BR>> So to all that are interested give the Web managers for the NSRCA some <BR>> time<BR>> to get the documents up and going online. They have been released for<BR>> publication as of now.<BR>><BR>><BR>> I want to thank the folks that helped work on this project.<BR>><BR>> Sportsman: Mark Hunt, Bruce Reins, Jerry Stebbins, Tom Simes<BR>><BR>> Intermediate: John Pavlick, Scott Smith, Michael Laggis, Pete Cosky, Randy<BR>>
Hatfield<BR>><BR>> Advanced: Mike Hester, Bill Pritchett, Chris White, Tim Taylor, Jarvis<BR>> Johnson<BR>><BR>> Masters: Bob Pastorello, Dave Lockhart, Joe Lachowski, Arch Stafford, Ed<BR>> Alt, Charlie Rock<BR>><BR>> My thanks go to these guys for the ideas. I just tried to compile the<BR>> results the best I could. We hope you all are happy with the sequences.<BR>> go to:<BR>> www.nsrca.org<BR>><BR>> There will be call sheets up, and then over the weekend hopefully the<BR>> Aresti, and detailed descriptors will follow.<BR>><BR>> Troy A. Newman<BR>> NSRCA Sequence Proposal Committee Chair<BR>><BR>><BR>> ----- Original Message ----- <BR>> From: "Terry Clendennen" <TCLENDENNEN@HOT.RR.COM><BR>> To: <DISCUSSION@NSRCA.ORG><BR>> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 6:02 PM<BR>> Subject: Re: Flying the new sequences<BR>><BR>><BR>>> I still haven't found these new sequences.Where are they?<BR>>> -----
Original Message ----- <BR>>> From: "Ron Van Putte" <VANPUTTE@COX.NET><BR>>> To: <DISCUSSION@NSRCA.ORG><BR>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 2:58 PM<BR>>> Subject: Re: Flying the new sequences<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> On Jun 7, 2005, at 9:59 AM, Bob Kane wrote:<BR>>><BR>>> > I'm having more trouble with the slow roll after the<BR>>> > figure 9 . . . . . . .<BR>>><BR>>> Hmmm, I must be getting better. I haven't had a problem with that one<BR>>> either. I WAS having trouble with the 1/4, 1/2, 1/4 Roll until I<BR>>> realized that I wasn't putting in enough rudder on the first point and<BR>>> was trying to roll too fast.<BR>>><BR>>> Ron Van Putte<BR>>><BR>>> ><BR>>> > --- Grow Pattern <PATTERN4U@COMCAST.NET>wrote:<BR>>> ><BR>>> >> It is a tough maneuver to draw correctly in the sky.<BR>>> >> That's why it is in at the
level I guess. In FAI<BR>>> >> they throw in a couple of 1/2 rolls to use up your<BR>>> >> 45 degree lines.<BR>>> >><BR>>> >> On a different subject. Is anyone finding it hard to<BR>>> >> present the reverse knife-edge after the top hat in<BR>>> >> masters this year?<BR>>> >><BR>>> >> Eric.<BR>>> >> ----- Original Message -----<BR>>> >> From: John Ferrell<BR>>> >> To: discussion@nsrca.org<BR>>> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:50 AM<BR>>> >> Subject: Re: Flying the new sequences<BR>>> >><BR>>> >><BR>>> >> It sounds pretty tricky. If the first radius on<BR>>> >> the push is not the "right amount" the line<BR>>> >> length/cross is bunged.<BR>>> >><BR>>> >> Like the figure M, it is merciful there are only<BR>>> >> 10 points to
lose!<BR>>> >><BR>>> >> John Ferrell<BR>>> >> http://DixieNC.US<BR>>> >><BR>>> >> ----- Original Message -----<BR>>> >> From: Grow Pattern<BR>>> >> To: discussion@nsrca.org<BR>>> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:08 AM<BR>>> >> Subject: Re: Flying the new sequences<BR>>> >><BR>>> >><BR>>> >> A golf ball is more akin to the current P-05<BR>>> >> "Goldfish" standing on end. An ice-cream cone has<BR>>> >> much steeper sides and ends in a point at center.<BR>>> >> The golf ball has a cross-over point at center of<BR>>> >> the two straight 45 degree equal length lines.<BR>>> >><BR>>> >> FAI describes it as - Golf ball from top: Push<BR>>> >> to a 45 degree downline, pull through ¾ of an inside<BR>>> >> loop to a 45 degree upline and push to
recover<BR>>> >> upright.<BR>>> >><BR>>> >> Regards,<BR>>> >><BR>>> >> Eric.<BR>>> >> ----- Original Message -----<BR>>> >> From: Wincons@aol.com<BR>>> >> To: discussion@nsrca.org<BR>>> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:05 AM<BR>>> >> Subject: Re: Flying the new sequences<BR>>> >><BR>>> >><BR>>> >> In a message dated 6/6/2005 11:03:17 P.M.<BR>>> >> Central Daylight Time, patterndude@comcast.net<BR>>> >> writes:<BR>>> >> The golf ball should really be named the ice<BR>>> >> cream cone, but it wouldn't fit on the call sheets<BR>>> >> easily. In this case it's a 45 degree downline, a<BR>>> >> 1/2 loop, a 45 degree upline back to center. Now<BR>>> >> help me with a spring coil!!!!<BR>>> >> --Lance<BR>>> >> Maybe 270 degrees
3/4 loop, not 180 deg<BR>>> >> half-loop?<BR>>> >><BR>>> >> Brian ;)<BR>>> ><BR>>> ><BR>>> > Bob Kane<BR>>> > getterflash@yahoo.com<BR>>> ><BR>>> > __________________________________________________<BR>>> > Do You Yahoo!?<BR>>> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around<BR>>> > http://mail.yahoo.com<BR>>> > =================================================<BR>>> > To access the email archives for this list, go to<BR>>> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/<BR>>> > To be removed from this list, go to <BR>>> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm<BR>>> > and follow the instructions.<BR>>> ><BR>>> > List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the<BR>>> > list.<BR>>> ><BR>>><BR>>> ================To access the email
archives for this list, go to<BR>>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/<BR>>> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm<BR>>> and follow the instructions.<BR>>><BR>>> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the<BR>> list.<BR>>><BR>>><BR>>><BR>>> =================================================<BR>>> To access the email archives for this list, go to<BR>>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/<BR>>> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm<BR>>> and follow the instructions.<BR>>><BR>>> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the<BR>> list.<BR>>><BR>>><BR>> =================================================<BR>> To access the email archives for this list, go to<BR>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/<BR>> To be removed
from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm<BR>> and follow the instructions.<BR>><BR>> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the <BR>> list.<BR>> <BR><BR>=================================================<BR>To access the email archives for this list, go to<BR>http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/<BR>To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm<BR>and follow the instructions.<BR><BR>List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>