<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Ron,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>You did not answer the question you only made a reply to one
sentence are not going to wait on input from the rest of the AMA membership
that is not on this list?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Lamar</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=vanputte@cox.net href="mailto:vanputte@cox.net">Ron Van Putte</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=discussion@nsrca.org
href="mailto:discussion@nsrca.org">discussion@nsrca.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, June 10, 2005 2:22 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [SPAM] Re: Landing
Direction</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>It may not be an emergency at many sites, but those who
attended the Knoxville contest will probably agree that it is. <BR><BR>Ron Van
Putte<BR><BR>On Jun 11, 2005, at 4:47 PM, Lamar Blair wrote:<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE>Ron, and All<BR><?smaller> <?/smaller><BR>This is a really
good question. In fact it has been added to the rules survey to find out
what pattern flyers think about the idea. <BR><?smaller> <?/smaller><BR>The new survey will be going
out to at least 1000 plus people, both NSRCA and Non-NSRCA
members.<BR><?smaller> <?/smaller><BR>This is not an emergency that
needs fixing in a hurry.<BR><?smaller> <?/smaller><BR>I hope that
you will hold off on your proposal until we get an answer back from
everyone. I also hope that you will have Don Ramsey and some others
look over the wording of your proposal so that we do not run into the
problems that we are having with the 2005-7 Take-offs and Landing
language.<BR><?smaller> <?/smaller><BR>BTW - I support the change, but
we must be careful of the wording and not have to turn around and
submit another proposal to fix one that is submitted without some NSRCA
process and attention.<BR><?smaller> <?/smaller><BR>Lamar
Blair<BR>NSRCA
President<BR>256-353-8154<BR><?color><?param 0000,0000,EEEE>l.blair@worldnet.att.net<?/color><?smaller> <?/smaller><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><?smaller> <?/smaller><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>-----
Original Message -----<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><BR><B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>From:<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?color><?param 0000,0000,EEEE><?x-tad-bigger>Ron Van
Putte<?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?x-tad-bigger> <?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><BR><B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>To:<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?color><?param 0000,0000,EEEE><?x-tad-bigger>discussion@nsrca.org<?/x-tad-bigger><?/color><?x-tad-bigger>
<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><BR><B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>Sent:<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>
Friday, June 10, 2005 8:08 AM<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><BR><B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>Subject:<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily></B><?fontfamily><?param Arial><?x-tad-bigger>
Landing Direction<?/x-tad-bigger><?/fontfamily><BR><BR>Based on the
positive response on the proposed change to landing direction, I sent my
draft landing direction rule change proposal to John Fuqua, the Contest
Board chairman, and he replied:<BR><BR>"How about this. Suggest you
put this as para 6.7 which is the 'Safety Requirements"
section. <BR><BR>"Normally landing would be as per paragraph 14.1
regarding Direction of Flight. However, when a wind shift results
in a downwind landing that creates a hazard to people or
the aircraft, subject to the approval of the judges, the landing direction
may be reversed.<BR><BR>(or maybe)<BR><BR>"Normally landing would be as
per paragraph 14.1 regarding Direction of Flight. However, subject
to the approval of the judges, the landing direction may be reversed when
a wind shift results in a downwind landing that creates
a hazard to people or the aircraft."<BR><BR>I prefer the second one
and will make an Emergency Proposal as soon as I can put it
together.<BR><BR>Ron Van
Putte</BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>